docs(kilo-docs): add content gap audit

This commit is contained in:
Emilie Schario
2026-07-06 21:47:38 -04:00
parent 08f2e96a62
commit a2e950a362
2 changed files with 158 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@ export const ContributingNav: NavSection[] = [
href: "/contributing/ecosystem",
children: "Ecosystem",
},
{
href: "/contributing/content-gap-audit",
children: "Content Gap Audit",
},
],
},
{
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
---
title: "Content Gap Audit"
description: "Documentation content gaps and improvement opportunities"
---
# Documentation Content Gap Audit
This page tracks identified gaps in Kilo documentation and guides prioritization for new content creation. Use this as a roadmap for documentation improvements.
## High-Priority Gaps
### 1. Changelog / Release Notes
**Status:** Missing
**Gap:** No dedicated changelog or release notes page exists for users to track feature releases, bug fixes, and breaking changes.
**Impact:** Users cannot easily discover what's new in each release or understand migration requirements.
**Recommendation:** Create a `/docs/changelog` page with:
- Release history (grouped by version)
- Feature additions with links to relevant docs
- Bug fixes and improvements
- Breaking changes with migration guidance
- Link to GitHub releases for full change details
### 2. Comprehensive Troubleshooting Hub
**Status:** Fragmented
**Gap:** Troubleshooting is scattered across multiple pages (extension-specific, enterprise migration, technical migration) with no central troubleshooting index.
**Impact:** Users struggle to find relevant troubleshooting content for their specific issue.
**Recommendation:** Create a `/docs/troubleshooting` hub page with:
- Issue categorization (installation, authentication, performance, etc.)
- Diagnostic checklists
- Links to platform-specific troubleshooting guides
- Common error code reference
- When to contact support
### 3. Documentation Style Guide
**Status:** Partial (only in AGENTS.md)
**Gap:** No user-facing documentation style guide for contributors. The style guidance exists in AGENTS.md but isn't discoverable for non-agent contributors.
**Impact:** Inconsistent documentation tone and format across contributors.
**Recommendation:** Create `/docs/contributing/documentation-style` with:
- Voice and tone guidelines
- Writing conventions (headings, code blocks, callouts)
- Link formatting standards
- Image and screenshot guidelines
- Markdoc component usage reference
### 4. LLM-First Documentation Guidance
**Status:** Minimal
**Gap:** The "Using Docs with Agents" page exists but lacks depth on best practices for AI-assisted documentation consumption.
**Impact:** Users working with AI tools may not optimize their doc usage effectively.
**Recommendation:** Enhance with:
- How to structure queries for documentation
- Best practices for extracting actionable steps
- Common patterns for AI-assisted troubleshooting
- Section-specific query examples
## Medium-Priority Gaps
### 5. Migration Guides (Beyond Cursor/Windsurf)
**Status:** Partial
**Gap:** Enterprise migration exists, but migration guidance from other tools (GitHub Copilot, Tabnine, CodeWhisperer, Replit AI) is limited to high-level comparison tables.
**Impact:** Teams evaluating Kilo face friction when migrating from popular alternatives.
**Recommendation:** Create dedicated migration guides for:
- `/docs/migration/github-copilot`
- `/docs/migration/tabnine`
- `/docs/migration/codewhisperer`
- Each with: detailed comparison, step-by-step migration, feature mapping, timeline planning
### 6. Deeper Reference Pages
**Status:** Partial
**Gap:** API reference exists for Gateway, but other components lack comprehensive reference documentation.
**Impact:** Developers building integrations or debugging face friction finding detailed specifications.
**Recommendation:** Add reference pages for:
- CLI command reference (beyond quickstart)
- Tool definitions and permissions
- MCP server configuration reference
- Custom mode schema reference
### 7. Contribution Workflow Deep Dive
**Status:** Basic
**Gap:** Current contribution docs cover basics but lack detailed workflow guidance for complex contributions.
**Impact:** New contributors may struggle with larger feature implementations.
**Recommendation:** Add:
- Feature proposal process details
- Code review expectations
- Testing requirements by package
- Merge process and CI requirements
## Lower-Priority Gaps
### 8. Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
**Status:** Not present
**Gap:** No documented architectural decisions or tradeoffs.
**Impact:** Future contributors lack context for why certain decisions were made.
**Recommendation:** Consider adding ADRs for major architectural choices.
### 9. Performance Optimization Guides
**Status:** Not present
**Gap:** No guidance on optimizing Kilo performance for large codebases or teams.
**Impact:** Users may not achieve optimal performance.
**Recommendation:** Create performance tuning guides for:
- Codebase indexing optimization
- Team-scale configuration
- Resource usage monitoring
## Gap Tracking Instructions
When working on documentation:
1. **Check this audit first** - Verify if a gap is still relevant
2. **Update status** - Mark completed items as done
3. **Add new gaps** - Document newly discovered gaps with the same format
4. **Prioritize** - Focus on high-impact, user-facing gaps first
## Related Resources
- [Contributing Overview](/docs/contributing)
- [AGENTS.md](https://github.com/Kilo-Org/kilocode/blob/main/AGENTS.md)
- [Feature Proposals](/docs/contributing/features)
- [Development Environment](/docs/contributing/development-environment)