PProf labels segment the code into groups for determing the source of
cpu/memory profiles. Since the web server and background jobs share a
lot of the same code (eg wsbuilder), it helps to know if the load is
user induced, or background job based.
Can do `author:username` to filter templates created by a certain
author. Adding to help clean out some templates that I created on our
dev instance. This makes sorting a bit easier.
`wsbuilder` hits the file cache when running validation. This solution is imperfect, but by first sorting workspaces by their template version id, the cache hit rate should improve.
`BuildError` response from `wsbuilder` does not support rich errors from validation. Changed this to use the `Validations` block of codersdk responses to return all errors for invalid parameters.
When in experimental this was used as an escape hatch. Removed to be
consistent with the template author's intentions
Backwards compatible, removing an experimental api field that is no longer used.
# What does this do?
This does parameter validation for dynamic parameters in `wsbuilder`. All input parameters are validated in `coder/coder` before being sent to terraform.
The heart of this PR is [`ResolveParameters`](https://github.com/coder/coder/blob/b65001e89c0577199a8e470c138c51e91cf2350c/coderd/dynamicparameters/resolver.go#L30-L30).
# What else changes?
`wsbuilder` now needs to load the terraform files into memory to succeed. This does add a larger memory requirement to workspace builds.
# Future work
- Sort autostart handling workspaces by template version id. So workspaces with the same template version only load the terraform files once from the db, and store them in the cache.
Use richer `previewtypes.Parameter` for `wsbuilder`. This is a pre-requirement to adding dynamic parameter validation.
The richer type contains more information than the `db` parameter, so the conversion is lossless.
This PR extracts dynamic parameter rendering logic from
coderd/parameters.go into a new coderd/dynamicparameters package. Partly
for organization and maintainability, but primarily to be reused in
`wsbuilder` to be leveraged as validation.
Large modules can potentially break or slow down template behaviors. Our
primary dogfood template should experience this if it becomes an issue.
Just trying to catch things in dogfood before we experience them in the
wild.
The file cache was caching the `Unauthorized` errors if a user without
the right perms opened the file first. So all future opens would fail.
Now the cache always opens with a subject that can read files. And authz
is checked on the Acquire per user.
This PR implements protobuf streaming to handle large module files by:
1. **Streaming large payloads**: When module files exceed the 4MB limit,
they're streamed in chunks using a new UploadFile RPC method
2. **Database storage**: Streamed files are stored in the database and
referenced by hash for deduplication
3. **Backward compatibility**: Small module files continue using the
existing direct payload method
.git directories were causing identical modules to have different
hashes. This adds unecessary bloat to the database, and the .git
directory is not needed for dynamic params
Auto select the proxy on first load (stored in local storage, so per
browser), then defer to user selection. The auto selected proxy will not
update again once set.
The existing code persists all static parameters and their values. Using
the previous build as the source if no new inputs are found.
Dynamic params do not have a state of the parameters saved to disk. So
instead, all previous values are persisted always, and new inputs
override.
Logs emitted by dynamic params did not have any additional scope or
context, and are not helpful in the current state. A future change can
capture these logs for display somewhere.
Does this by using latest `preview`
Dynamic params skip parameter validation in coder/coder.
This is because conditional parameters cannot be validated
with the static parameters in the database.
Pass through the user input as is. The previous code only passed through
parameters that existed in the db (static params). This would omit
conditional params.
Validation is enforced by the dynamic params websocket, so validation at
this point is not required.
Existing template versions do not have the metadata (modules + plan) in
the db. So revert to using static parameter information from the
original template import.
This data will still be served over the websocket.
Closes https://github.com/coder/coder/issues/17691
`ExtractOrganizationMembersParam` will allow fetching a user with only
organization permissions. If the user belongs to 0 orgs, then the user "does not exist"
from an org perspective. But if you are a site-wide admin, then the user does exist.
If this value was set before v2.19.0, then assign_default was in a json
field that would not match. And it would default to `false`. This
corrects that.
Deleted organizations are still attempting to sync members. This causes
an error on inserting the member, and would likely cause issues later in
the sync process even if that member is inserted. Deleted orgs should be
skipped.
Using negative permissions, this role prevents a user's ability to
create & delete a workspace within a given organization.
Workspaces are uniquely owned by an org and a user, so the org has to
supercede the user permission with a negative permission.
# Use case
Organizations must be able to restrict a member's ability to create a
workspace. This permission is implicitly granted (see
https://github.com/coder/coder/issues/16546#issuecomment-2655437860).
To revoke this permission, the solution chosen was to use negative
permissions in a built in role called `WorkspaceCreationBan`.
# Rational
Using negative permissions is new territory, and not ideal. However,
workspaces are in a unique position.
Workspaces have 2 owners. The organization and the user. To prevent
users from creating a workspace in another organization, an [implied
negative
permission](https://github.com/coder/coder/blob/36d9f5ddb3d98029fee07d004709e1e51022e979/coderd/rbac/policy.rego#L172-L192)
is used. So the truth table looks like: _how to read this table
[here](https://github.com/coder/coder/blob/36d9f5ddb3d98029fee07d004709e1e51022e979/coderd/rbac/README.md#roles)_
| Role (example) | Site | Org | User | Result |
|-----------------|------|------|------|--------|
| non-org-member | \_ | N | YN\_ | N |
| user | \_ | \_ | Y | Y |
| WorkspaceBan | \_ | N | Y | Y |
| unauthenticated | \_ | \_ | \_ | N |
This new role, `WorkspaceCreationBan` is the same truth table condition
as if the user was not a member of the organization (when doing a
workspace create/delete). So this behavior **is not entirely new**.
<details>
<summary>How to do it without a negative permission</summary>
The alternate approach would be to remove the implied permission, and
grant it via and organization role. However this would add new behavior
that an organizational role has the ability to grant a user permissions
on their own resources?
It does not make sense for an org role to prevent user from changing
their profile information for example. So the only option is to create a
new truth table column for resources that are owned by both an
organization and a user.
| Role (example) | Site | Org |User+Org| User | Result |
|-----------------|------|------|--------|------|--------|
| non-org-member | \_ | N | \_ | \_ | N |
| user | \_ | \_ | \_ | \_ | N |
| WorkspaceAllow | \_ | \_ | Y | \_ | Y |
| unauthenticated | \_ | \_ | \_ | \_ | N |
Now a user has no opinion on if they can create a workspace, which feels
a little wrong. A user should have the authority over what is theres.
There is fundamental _philosophical_ question of "Who does a workspace
belong to?". The user has some set of autonomy, yet it is the
organization that controls it's existence. A head scratcher 🤔
</details>
## Will we need more negative built in roles?
There are few resources that have shared ownership. Only
`ResourceOrganizationMember` and `ResourceGroupMember`. Since negative
permissions is intended to revoke access to a shared resource, then
**no.** **This is the only one we need**.
Classic resources like `ResourceTemplate` are entirely controlled by the
Organization permissions. And resources entirely in the user control
(like user profile) are only controlled by `User` permissions.
![Uploading Screenshot 2025-02-26 at 22.26.52.png…]()
---------
Co-authored-by: Jaayden Halko <jaayden.halko@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: ケイラ <mckayla@hey.com>
Niche edge case, assumes access_token is jwt.
Some `access_token`s are JWT's with potential useful claims.
These claims would be nearly equivalent to `user_info` claims.
This is not apart of the oauth spec, so this feature should not be
loudly advertised. If using this feature, alternate solutions are preferred.
Provisioner key permissions were never any different than provisioners.
Merging them for a cleaner permission story until they are required (if
ever) to be seperate.
This removed `ResourceProvisionerKey` from RBAC and just uses the
existing `ResourceProvisioner`.
Template `use` is now a verb.
- Template admins can `use` all templates (org template admins same in
org)
- Members get the `use` perm from the `everyone` group in the
`group_acl`.
Opting into rego v1. Rego v1 requires `if` for all rule statements.
This PR updates the dependencies and the rego policy itself.
Golang imports upgraded for opa/rego
---------
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Steven Masley