docs(core): add Open source vs Commercial comparison page (#2382)

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Pin Hsu Chen
2026-06-21 12:10:57 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 2b2897b95d
commit 1407f2807e
+39
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
---
sidebar_label: Open source vs Commercial
---
# Open source vs Commercial
Wren AI open source is the full engine: free, self-hosted, and driven by one engineer or agent through the CLI and SDK.
Wren AI Commercial is the same engine built for a team. It runs as a hosted cloud service or as a self-hosted enterprise deployment, and it adds a web UI, accounts, managed access control, integrations, and support. Full overview: [Wren AI Commercial](/cp/overview).
## Feature comparison
| Capability | Open source | Commercial |
| --- | :---: | :---: |
| Free and fully self-hosted | ✅ | ✅ |
| Fully managed cloud | ❌ | ✅ |
| CLI and SDK for your own agents | ✅ | ✅ |
| MCP server and hosted REST API | ❌ | ✅ |
| Access control defined in MDL (RLAC/CLAC) | ✅ | ✅ |
| GenBI dashboards | ✅ | ✅ |
| Web UI for non-technical users | ❌ | ✅ |
| Slack and Microsoft Teams | ❌ | ✅ |
| Built-in agentic sandbox mode | ❌ | ✅ |
| Accounts, roles, multi-user | ❌ | ✅ |
| SSO, LDAP, SCIM provisioning | ❌ | ✅ |
| RLS/CLS per user, session properties, audit log | ❌ | ✅ |
| Evaluation, AI Advisor, feedback tracing | ❌ | ✅ |
| Vendor support | ❌ | ✅ |
## Consider Commercial when
- A team needs accounts, roles, and SSO, or LDAP/SCIM from your identity provider.
- Non-technical users want to ask in a browser, Slack, or Teams.
- You need RLS/CLS enforced per real user, or multi-tenant isolation for your own customers.
- You want a managed cloud, scheduled dashboards, or vendor support.
## Talk to us
See [Wren AI Commercial](/cp/overview) for details and to reach the team. Open source stays first-class either way.