mirror of
https://github.com/simstudioai/sim.git
synced 2026-10-31 03:47:12 +08:00
* improvement(billing): make usage ledger-only and close cycles off period advance Usage is now the attributed usage_log ledger everywhere: the userStats baselines (currentPeriodCost / currentPeriodCopilotCost), the includeLegacyBaseline compatibility flag, the pro-snapshot join/leave machinery, and departedMemberUsage accrual are removed from all read and write paths. Cycle rollover (final sub-threshold overage collection, billedOverageThisPeriod reset, last-period bookkeeping) moves off the invoice.finalized payload parsing — dead for org subscriptions since May — onto a period-advance sweep with a durable per-subscription close marker (subscription.last_closed_period_start), transaction-enlisted Stripe outbox invoicing, and stamp-matched ledger sums. Enterprise closes are bookkeeping-only; reporting-anchor orgs advance the marker alone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(billing): include departed actors in close refresh and gate threshold billing on close currency Cycle close now unions current members with every actor holding org-stamped ledger rows in the closed period, so a departed member's daily-refresh consumption offsets the final overage exactly like their billed usage. Threshold billing defers with a pending-cycle-close no-op while a subscription's close marker lags its current period, so the shared billedOverageThisPeriod tracker can never mix an elapsed period's settlements with the new period's. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(billing): seal cycle-close races and align refresh actors with billed usage Threshold settlement revalidates the close marker and period under the tracker lock via the same isSubscriptionCycleCloseCurrent predicate the preflight uses, so a rollover between check and transaction aborts as a concurrent-state retry instead of settling against the wrong cycle. Terminal bookkeeping claims the close marker with its tracker reset, so a deletion racing an in-flight sweep close serializes through the one marker and the loser rolls back rather than re-billing settled overage; anchored enterprise deletions only claim the marker since their windows derive from the anchor, not Stripe bounds. A close with overage due but missing Stripe identifiers now defers loudly instead of claiming the marker and silently forgiving the money, the closed window's start derives from the ledger's own period stamps so anchor-day drift cannot misalign the refresh window, calculateSubscriptionOverage unions departed ledger actors into the org refresh deduction like the close does, and blocked accounts report their real ledger usage while staying blocked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(billing): defer ownerless org closes and make the drift test load-bearing A close with overage due but no owner-role member now defers loudly like the missing-Stripe-identifier case instead of claiming the marker and silently forgiving the money. The stamp-drift test pins the marker before the stamped boundary so only the ledger-stamp lookup can produce the asserted window. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(helm): bump chart to 1.6.0 for the billing-cycle-close cron job Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(billing): revalidate the org roster under close locks and align invoice labels The close re-reads the member roster inside its transaction and defers on any change, mirroring threshold billing — an owner transfer moves the billed-overage tracker between rows, so a pre-lock roster could settle against the wrong tracker. Invoice labels now use the closed period's end month like every other overage path, and the sweep test's rows are shaped like rows the candidate query can actually return. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(billing): hold cycle close for a settlement grace after rollover Billing attribution is frozen at run start, so a run straddling a rollover can insert elapsed-period-stamped rows after the period ends. Closing only once the rollover is older than any possible in-flight run guarantees the close's ledger sums are final; the sweep picks the period up on a later run. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(billing): resolve reporting windows through the canonical period resolver The close paths now ask resolveSubscriptionUsagePeriod whether a subscription derives its windows from a reporting anchor instead of re-checking metadata shape locally, so a malformed hand-edited anchor that the resolver rejects (falling back to Stripe bounds) books its Stripe-stamped ledger rows normally instead of skipping bookkeeping. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(billing): union departed ledger actors in org threshold settlement Organization threshold billing now reads the period ledger per user and unions the actors holding org-attributed rows with the current roster before computing refresh deductions — the same actor set calculateSubscriptionOverage and the cycle close use — so a departed member's usage cannot be settled without their daily-refresh offset. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(billing): claim the terminal period before deletion settlement and delete vestigial refresh bounds Subscription deletion now claims the close marker from the fresh subscription row before computing or charging final overage, serializing with the cycle-close sweep so both paths can never bill the same period — an in-flight close fails its guarded claim and rolls back, and the deletion settles against the row's real period instead of a possibly stale webhook payload. The per-user refresh bounds machinery is deleted outright: its only source was proPeriodCostSnapshotAt, which this PR stopped writing, and ledger entity stamps already scope refresh to org-attributed rows — a joiner's pre-join usage is user-stamped and can never enter the org refresh scan, while a departed member's org-stamped rows participate exactly like a current member's. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(billing): scope daily refresh by entity stamps and close lagging periods before deletion settlement The refresh actor-list threading (userIds + departed-actor unions) violated the entity-stamp principle the ledger sums already follow: org-attributed rows from departed members counted in pooled usage but never consumed refresh on the monitor/resolved-usage paths. Daily refresh now scopes rows by the same write-time entity and period stamps as the ledger — no actor list anywhere — which deletes the unions, the rollup memberIds, and the org-specific refresh variant. Deletion settlement now closes any elapsed-but-unclosed period (grace bypassed — no later sweep revisits a canceled sub) before claiming the terminal period, so a deletion racing the sweep can no longer jump the marker past an unsettled period and silently forgive its final overage. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(billing): bucket refresh by clamped day so stamped stragglers stay in the deduction Refresh membership is now the entity/period stamps alone — identical to the ledger sums it offsets. A row written after the rollover but stamped to the elapsed period (attribution frozen at run start) is billed by the stamp-based close, so it must consume refresh too; created-at now only assigns the day bucket, clamped into the period, instead of excluding the row entirely. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(billing): pair the overage tracker with the marker's period and pin test clocks billedOverageThisPeriod only ever holds collections for the period that began at the close marker — the threshold gate blocks settlement whenever the marker lags. Both consumers now honor that pairing: a close that skipped forgiven periods counts nothing from the tracker against the period it bills, and the deletion settlement ignores the tracker when the marker was still lagging at claim time. Ignoring is provably safe in both cases because a lagging marker means no current-period collections exist. The cycle-close and daily-refresh suites pin the system clock: their grace and window checks compare fixed period fixtures against Date.now(), which made them dependent on the host date. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(billing): reject lagging terminal claims and thread billingInterval into deletion bookkeeping claimTerminalPeriod no longer advances the marker over an unclosed elapsed period: a lagging marker is reported without a write so the deletion handler can run the elapsed close once more (healing a rollover that committed between close and claim) and only then seal the marker explicitly, with an error log, when the period is genuinely unclosable. Sealing preserves the in-flight-sweep abort guarantee. Deletion bookkeeping now passes the subscription's billingInterval through, so an enterprise reporting subscription whose interval lives on the row column (not metadata) still resolves as reporting-anchored and keeps its bookkeeping no-op, matching every other resolver call site. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1412 lines
52 KiB
TypeScript
1412 lines
52 KiB
TypeScript
#!/usr/bin/env bun
|
|
import { readdir, readFile } from 'node:fs/promises'
|
|
import path from 'node:path'
|
|
|
|
const ROOT = path.resolve(import.meta.dir, '..')
|
|
const API_DIR = path.join(ROOT, 'apps/sim/app/api')
|
|
const CONTRACTS_DIR = path.join(ROOT, 'apps/sim/lib/api/contracts')
|
|
const QUERY_HOOKS_DIR = path.join(ROOT, 'apps/sim/hooks/queries')
|
|
const SELECTOR_HOOKS_DIR = path.join(ROOT, 'apps/sim/hooks/selectors')
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* `totalRoutes` is reported, never gated.
|
|
*
|
|
* The invariant worth holding is that every route is contract-backed, and
|
|
* `nonZodRoutes` states exactly that: it is 0, and rises the moment a route ships
|
|
* without one. Failing on the total as well meant a fully compliant new route
|
|
* still turned CI red, fixable only by editing the number here. A ratchet
|
|
* survives on the habit of never bumping it casually, and a gate that must be
|
|
* bumped to add a compliant route teaches precisely the opposite habit — on a
|
|
* file whose other seven baselines depend on that habit holding.
|
|
*/
|
|
const BASELINE = {
|
|
totalRoutes: 1201,
|
|
zodRoutes: 1201,
|
|
nonZodRoutes: 0,
|
|
} as const
|
|
|
|
const BOUNDARY_POLICY_BASELINE = {
|
|
routeZodImports: 0,
|
|
routeLocalSchemaRoutes: 0,
|
|
routeLocalSchemaConstructors: 0,
|
|
routeZodErrorReferences: 0,
|
|
clientHookZodImports: 0,
|
|
clientHookLocalSchemaFiles: 0,
|
|
clientHookLocalSchemaConstructors: 0,
|
|
clientHookRawFetches: 0,
|
|
clientSameOriginApiFetches: 0,
|
|
doubleCasts: 6,
|
|
rawJsonReads: 5,
|
|
untypedResponses: 0,
|
|
annotationsMissingReason: 0,
|
|
} as const
|
|
|
|
const INDIRECT_ZOD_ROUTES = new Set([
|
|
// Catch-all JSON 404 for unknown /api/v2 paths. It has no contract by
|
|
// construction: it exists precisely for requests that match no operation, so
|
|
// there is no input to validate and its only response is the fixed v2 error
|
|
// envelope.
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/v2/[[...segments]]/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/demo-requests/route.ts',
|
|
// Input-less session-bound GET: nothing to validate; response is
|
|
// contract-typed via `satisfies InvitationDetails` in the route.
|
|
// Public updater feed: input-less GET, session-less, returns YAML (not JSON),
|
|
// so it can't be JSON-contract-bound. Wrapped in withRouteHandler.
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/desktop/update/latest-mac.yml/route.ts',
|
|
// Public updater download redirect: input-less GET, session-less, whose only
|
|
// response is a 302 to a GitHub release asset. Wrapped in withRouteHandler.
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/desktop/update/download/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/invitations/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/logs/export/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/tools/docusign/route.ts',
|
|
// Better Auth handles its own validation for the catch-all route below.
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/auth/[...all]/route.ts',
|
|
// Better Auth handles validation for the Stripe webhook handler.
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/auth/webhook/stripe/route.ts',
|
|
// Routes with no client-supplied input that previously had no-op
|
|
// `z.object({}).strict().parse({})` guards. The boundary contract for
|
|
// these routes is "no input", and they consume validated data only via
|
|
// session/headers handled by `getSession()` / Better Auth.
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/auth/oauth/connections/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/auth/providers/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/auth/socket-token/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/desktop/auth/handoff/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/workspaces/invitations/route.ts',
|
|
// Internal cron entry point that authenticates via `Authorization: Bearer
|
|
// CRON_SECRET` and ignores query/body. The boundary contract is "no
|
|
// client-supplied input"; query params from external callers are not
|
|
// consumed.
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/schedules/execute/route.ts',
|
|
// Routes with no client-supplied input. Auth is handled via session/cron/internal
|
|
// tokens and there are no params, query, or body to validate. Previously had
|
|
// no-op `validateSchema(noInputSchema, {})` guards.
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/health/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/settings/allowed-providers/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/settings/allowed-integrations/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/settings/allowed-mcp-domains/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/cron/cleanup-tasks/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/cron/cleanup-soft-deletes/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/cron/cleanup-stale-executions/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/cron/cleanup-sandbox-images/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/cron/renew-subscriptions/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/cron/billing-cycle-close/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/cron/reconcile-billing-seats/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/cron/reconcile-inbox-entitlement/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/cron/run-data-drains/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/logs/cleanup/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/knowledge/connectors/sync/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/webhooks/outbox/process/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/webhooks/cleanup/idempotency/route.ts',
|
|
// Shared Slack app event ingest. The body is an opaque, HMAC-verified Slack
|
|
// event envelope (varies per event type) read via parseWebhookBody; there is
|
|
// no client contract to bind — authenticity is enforced by signature.
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/webhooks/slack/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/webhooks/slack/custom/[credentialId]/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/resume/poll/route.ts',
|
|
// MCP routes that take only auth context (no client-supplied params/query/body).
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/discover/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/tools/stored/route.ts',
|
|
// MCP OAuth callback is the provider redirect target — the response is HTML
|
|
// that closes the popup, so the JSON-mode contract framework doesn't fit.
|
|
// Validation is enforced via state lookup + session-vs-row userId match.
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/oauth/callback/route.ts',
|
|
// Deprecated Copilot MCP surface: these routes are gated to always return
|
|
// 410 Gone and consume no client-supplied input.
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/copilot/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/copilot/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/copilot/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/route.ts',
|
|
// Deprecated v1 headless copilot chat API: gated to always return 410 Gone
|
|
// and consumes no client-supplied input.
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/v1/copilot/chat/route.ts',
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Routes baseline-allowed to use `await request.json()` / `await req.json()`
|
|
* directly (without an inline `// boundary-raw-json:` annotation).
|
|
*
|
|
* These are legitimately partial: tolerant body parses (`.catch(() => ({}))`),
|
|
* JSON-RPC envelopes that need their own dispatch, multi-stage MCP routes that
|
|
* read pre-parsed bodies, and routes whose Zod-backed migration is queued
|
|
* behind a separate contract / schema authoring step. New routes must NOT
|
|
* introduce raw `await request.json()` reads — annotate the call with
|
|
* `// boundary-raw-json: <reason>` instead.
|
|
*/
|
|
const RAW_JSON_BASELINE_ROUTES = new Set([
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/billing/portal/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/copilot/api-keys/generate/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/copilot/api-keys/validate/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/copilot/chat/abort/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/folders/[id]/restore/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/invitations/[id]/accept/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/invitations/[id]/reject/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/invitations/[id]/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/knowledge/[id]/documents/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/knowledge/[id]/documents/[documentId]/chunks/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/serve/[serverId]/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/servers/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/servers/[id]/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/servers/test-connection/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/tools/discover/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/tools/execute/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/workflow-servers/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/workflow-servers/[id]/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/workflow-servers/[id]/tools/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/mcp/workflow-servers/[id]/tools/[toolId]/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/organizations/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/organizations/[id]/invitations/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/organizations/[id]/members/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/organizations/[id]/transfer-ownership/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/resume/[workflowId]/[executionId]/[contextId]/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/speech/token/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/table/[tableId]/rows/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/tools/file/manage/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/workspaces/invitations/batch/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/workspaces/[id]/route.ts',
|
|
'apps/sim/app/api/workspaces/[id]/files/[fileId]/content/route.ts',
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
const CONTRACT_IMPORT_PATTERN = /\bfrom\s+['"]@\/lib\/api\/contracts(?:\/[^'"]*)?['"]/
|
|
const DECLARATIVE_ROUTE_BUILDER_IMPORT_PATTERN =
|
|
/\bimport\s*\{[^}]*(?:\bdefineInternalJsonRoute\b|\bdefineV2JsonRoute\b|\bdefineInternalBinaryRoute\b|\bdefineV2BinaryRoute\b)[^}]*\}\s*from\s*['"]@\/lib\/api\/server\/routes['"]/
|
|
const DECLARATIVE_ROUTE_BUILDER_USAGE_PATTERN =
|
|
/\b(?:defineInternalJsonRoute|defineV2JsonRoute|defineInternalBinaryRoute|defineV2BinaryRoute)\s*\(/
|
|
const SERVER_VALIDATION_IMPORT_PATTERN = /\bfrom\s+['"]@\/lib\/api\/server(?:\/validation)?['"]/
|
|
const SCHEMA_PARSE_PATTERN = /\b\w+Schema\.(?:safeParse|parse)\(/
|
|
const CONTRACT_SERVER_HELPER_PATTERN = /\bparseToolRequest\(/
|
|
const CANONICAL_HELPER_USAGE_PATTERN =
|
|
/\b(?:isZodError|validationErrorResponse|validationErrorResponseFromError|getValidationErrorMessage)\s*\(/
|
|
const CONTRACT_MAP_PARSE_PATTERN =
|
|
/\b\w+ContractsByPath[\s\S]{0,600}\.(?:body|query|params)!?\.(?:safeParse|parse)\(/
|
|
/**
|
|
* Matches `from 'zod'` and any zod subpath import like `from 'zod/v4'` or
|
|
* `from 'zod/mini'`. The capturing-group-free alternation keeps this safe to
|
|
* use with `.test(...)` and `.replace(...)` callers.
|
|
*/
|
|
const ZOD_IMPORT_PATTERN = /\bfrom\s+['"]zod(?:\/[^'"]+)?['"]/
|
|
const ZOD_REQUIRE_PATTERN = /\brequire\(['"]zod(?:\/[^'"]+)?['"]\)/
|
|
const ZOD_SCHEMA_CONSTRUCTOR_PATTERN =
|
|
/\bz\.(?:object|string|number|boolean|array|enum|nativeEnum|union|discriminatedUnion|record|literal|tuple|preprocess|coerce|date|unknown|any|instanceof|custom|lazy)\s*\(/g
|
|
const ZOD_ERROR_PATTERN = /\bZodError\b|\bz\.ZodError\b/
|
|
const SKIP_DIRS = new Set(['node_modules', '.next', '.turbo', 'coverage'])
|
|
const WIRE_TYPE_DECLARATION_PATTERN =
|
|
/(?:^|\n)\s*(?:export\s+)?(interface|type)\s+([A-Z]\w*(?:Response|Result))\b(?=\s*(?:=|extends|\{))/g
|
|
const CONTRACT_DERIVED_WIRE_TYPE_PATTERN =
|
|
/\b(?:ContractJsonResponse|ContractJsonErrorResponse|z\.(?:input|output|infer))\b/
|
|
|
|
const RAW_FETCH_PATTERN = /\bfetch\(/g
|
|
const RAW_FETCH_HELPER_GUARD_PATTERN = /(?:requestJson|requestRaw|prefetchJson|preFetchJson)$/
|
|
/**
|
|
* Matches `fetch(` (with optional whitespace, including newlines) followed by
|
|
* a string literal — single quote, double quote, or template literal —
|
|
* whose first character is `/api/`. This catches same-origin internal API
|
|
* fetches in any non-test source file under `apps/sim/**` that aren't an
|
|
* `app/api/**\/route.ts` server handler. Template literals with leading
|
|
* interpolations (e.g. `${base}/api/foo`) are intentionally NOT matched
|
|
* because they're rare and could trigger false positives on non-`/api/` URLs.
|
|
*/
|
|
const SAME_ORIGIN_API_FETCH_PATTERN = /\bfetch\(\s*[`'"]\/api\//g
|
|
const DOUBLE_CAST_PATTERN = /\bas unknown as\b/g
|
|
/**
|
|
* Matches `await request.json()` / `await req.json()` and the multi-line
|
|
* `await request.clone().json()` clone-then-read variant. Both forms read
|
|
* the request body without going through `parseRequest(...)` / a contract
|
|
* and count toward the `rawJsonReads` ratchet.
|
|
*
|
|
* `\s` is multi-line (handles common Prettier/Biome formatting where the
|
|
* `.clone()` and `.json()` calls land on separate lines).
|
|
*/
|
|
const RAW_JSON_READ_PATTERN =
|
|
/\bawait\s+(?:request|req)\s*(?:\.\s*clone\s*\(\s*\))?\s*\.\s*json\s*\(\s*\)/g
|
|
/**
|
|
* Matches `schema:` followed directly by a "validates nothing" zod construct.
|
|
* Three forms are treated equivalently:
|
|
* 1. `schema: z.unknown()` — no validation at all.
|
|
* 2. `schema: z.object({}).passthrough()` — validates only that the value
|
|
* is an object; allows any keys/values.
|
|
* 3. `schema: z.record(z.string(), z.unknown())` — validates only that the
|
|
* value is a string-keyed object; values are arbitrary.
|
|
*
|
|
* Anchored on the literal `schema:` token so that nested `z.unknown()` /
|
|
* `z.object({}).passthrough()` uses inside an otherwise-typed object schema
|
|
* are NOT flagged — only the top-level response declaration in
|
|
* `defineRouteContract({ ..., response: { mode: 'json', schema: ... } })`.
|
|
*/
|
|
const UNTYPED_RESPONSE_PATTERN =
|
|
/\bschema\s*:\s*(?:z\.unknown\s*\(\s*\)|z\.object\s*\(\s*\{\s*\}\s*\)\s*\.passthrough\s*\(\s*\)|z\.record\s*\(\s*z\.string\s*\(\s*\)\s*,\s*z\.unknown\s*\(\s*\)\s*\))/g
|
|
const RAW_FETCH_ANNOTATION_PREFIX = '// boundary-raw-fetch:'
|
|
const DOUBLE_CAST_ANNOTATION_PREFIX = '// double-cast-allowed:'
|
|
const RAW_JSON_ANNOTATION_PREFIX = '// boundary-raw-json:'
|
|
const UNTYPED_RESPONSE_ANNOTATION_PREFIX = '// untyped-response:'
|
|
const SOURCE_FILE_EXTENSIONS = /\.(?:ts|tsx)$/
|
|
const TEST_FILE_PATTERN = /(?:\.test|\.spec)\.(?:ts|tsx)$/
|
|
const TEST_HELPER_FILE_PATTERN = /(?:^|\/)test-[^/]+\.ts$/
|
|
const TEST_DIR_SEGMENT_PATTERN = /(?:^|\/)(?:__tests__|testing)(?:\/|$)/
|
|
/**
|
|
* Skips user-uploaded content stored under `apps/sim/uploads/...` (workspace
|
|
* file uploads, etc.). Does NOT match `apps/sim/lib/uploads/...`, which is
|
|
* source code for the uploads subsystem.
|
|
*/
|
|
const USER_UPLOADS_DIR_PATTERN = /(?:^|\/)apps\/sim\/uploads(?:\/|$)/
|
|
const SOURCE_SKIP_DIRS = new Set([
|
|
'node_modules',
|
|
'.next',
|
|
'.turbo',
|
|
'coverage',
|
|
'dist',
|
|
'__tests__',
|
|
'testing',
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
type AnnotationKind = 'raw-fetch' | 'double-cast' | 'raw-json' | 'untyped-response'
|
|
|
|
interface AnnotationResult {
|
|
allowed: boolean
|
|
missingReason: boolean
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
interface RawFetchFinding {
|
|
path: string
|
|
line: number
|
|
preview: string
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
interface SameOriginApiFetchFinding {
|
|
path: string
|
|
line: number
|
|
preview: string
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
interface DoubleCastFinding {
|
|
path: string
|
|
line: number
|
|
preview: string
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
interface RawJsonFinding {
|
|
path: string
|
|
line: number
|
|
preview: string
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
interface UntypedResponseFinding {
|
|
path: string
|
|
line: number
|
|
preview: string
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
interface AnnotationMissingReasonFinding {
|
|
path: string
|
|
line: number
|
|
kind: AnnotationKind
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
interface RouteAudit {
|
|
path: string
|
|
usesZod: boolean
|
|
hasZodImport: boolean
|
|
schemaConstructorCount: number
|
|
hasZodErrorReference: boolean
|
|
hasBodyRead: boolean
|
|
hasQueryRead: boolean
|
|
hasFormDataRead: boolean
|
|
hasParamsContext: boolean
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
interface WireTypeFinding {
|
|
path: string
|
|
name: string
|
|
line: number
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
interface QueryHookAudit {
|
|
path: string
|
|
hasZodImport: boolean
|
|
schemaConstructorCount: number
|
|
adHocWireTypes: WireTypeFinding[]
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
interface FamilyStats {
|
|
total: number
|
|
zod: number
|
|
nonZod: number
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type BoundaryPolicyKey = keyof typeof BOUNDARY_POLICY_BASELINE
|
|
|
|
interface BoundaryPolicyMetric {
|
|
key: BoundaryPolicyKey
|
|
label: string
|
|
current: number
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
interface PrintOnlyBoundaryPolicyMetric {
|
|
label: string
|
|
current: number
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function walk(
|
|
dir: string,
|
|
shouldIncludeFile: (fileName: string) => boolean,
|
|
results: string[] = []
|
|
): Promise<string[]> {
|
|
const entries = await readdir(dir, { withFileTypes: true })
|
|
|
|
for (const entry of entries) {
|
|
if (SKIP_DIRS.has(entry.name)) continue
|
|
|
|
const fullPath = path.join(dir, entry.name)
|
|
if (entry.isDirectory()) {
|
|
await walk(fullPath, shouldIncludeFile, results)
|
|
} else if (shouldIncludeFile(entry.name)) {
|
|
results.push(fullPath)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return results
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function lineNumberForIndex(content: string, index: number): number {
|
|
let line = 1
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < index; i++) {
|
|
if (content.charCodeAt(i) === 10) line += 1
|
|
}
|
|
return line
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Inspects up to three consecutive non-empty preceding lines for an
|
|
* opt-out annotation matching the given kind. The annotation is allowed
|
|
* when the matching prefix is followed by a non-empty reason. When the
|
|
* prefix is present but the reason is empty, `missingReason` is set so
|
|
* the audit can flag and fail on dangling annotations.
|
|
*/
|
|
function extractAnnotation(
|
|
content: string,
|
|
lineIndex: number,
|
|
kind: AnnotationKind
|
|
): AnnotationResult {
|
|
const prefix =
|
|
kind === 'raw-fetch'
|
|
? RAW_FETCH_ANNOTATION_PREFIX
|
|
: kind === 'double-cast'
|
|
? DOUBLE_CAST_ANNOTATION_PREFIX
|
|
: kind === 'raw-json'
|
|
? RAW_JSON_ANNOTATION_PREFIX
|
|
: UNTYPED_RESPONSE_ANNOTATION_PREFIX
|
|
const lines = content.split('\n')
|
|
let inspected = 0
|
|
|
|
for (let i = lineIndex - 1; i >= 0 && inspected < 3; i -= 1) {
|
|
const trimmed = lines[i]?.trim() ?? ''
|
|
if (trimmed.length === 0) continue
|
|
inspected += 1
|
|
|
|
if (!trimmed.startsWith('//')) {
|
|
return { allowed: false, missingReason: false }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const prefixIndex = trimmed.indexOf(prefix)
|
|
if (prefixIndex === -1) continue
|
|
|
|
const reason = trimmed.slice(prefixIndex + prefix.length).trim()
|
|
if (reason.length === 0) {
|
|
return { allowed: false, missingReason: true }
|
|
}
|
|
return { allowed: true, missingReason: false }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return { allowed: false, missingReason: false }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Walks `apps/sim/**` and optionally `packages/**` for `.ts` / `.tsx`
|
|
* source files, excluding tests, build artifacts, and coverage output.
|
|
* Kept separate from `walk(API_DIR)` because the source-wide audit has
|
|
* different exclusion rules than the route audit.
|
|
*/
|
|
async function walkAllSourceFiles(root: string, includePackages: boolean): Promise<string[]> {
|
|
const roots = includePackages
|
|
? [path.join(root, 'apps/sim'), path.join(root, 'packages')]
|
|
: [path.join(root, 'apps/sim')]
|
|
const results: string[] = []
|
|
|
|
for (const start of roots) {
|
|
await walkSourceTree(start, results)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return results
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function walkSourceTree(dir: string, results: string[]): Promise<void> {
|
|
let entries
|
|
try {
|
|
entries = await readdir(dir, { withFileTypes: true })
|
|
} catch {
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (const entry of entries) {
|
|
if (SOURCE_SKIP_DIRS.has(entry.name)) continue
|
|
|
|
const fullPath = path.join(dir, entry.name)
|
|
if (entry.isDirectory()) {
|
|
await walkSourceTree(fullPath, results)
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!SOURCE_FILE_EXTENSIONS.test(entry.name)) continue
|
|
if (TEST_FILE_PATTERN.test(entry.name)) continue
|
|
if (TEST_HELPER_FILE_PATTERN.test(entry.name)) continue
|
|
if (TEST_DIR_SEGMENT_PATTERN.test(fullPath)) continue
|
|
if (USER_UPLOADS_DIR_PATTERN.test(fullPath)) continue
|
|
|
|
results.push(fullPath)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function isContractFetchHelperCall(line: string, matchIndex: number): boolean {
|
|
const before = line.slice(0, matchIndex)
|
|
return RAW_FETCH_HELPER_GUARD_PATTERN.test(before)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function buildPreview(line: string): string {
|
|
return line.trim().slice(0, 160)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function findRawFetchFindings(
|
|
filePath: string,
|
|
content: string
|
|
): {
|
|
findings: RawFetchFinding[]
|
|
exemptions: number
|
|
missingReasons: AnnotationMissingReasonFinding[]
|
|
} {
|
|
const relativePath = path.relative(ROOT, filePath)
|
|
const lines = content.split('\n')
|
|
const findings: RawFetchFinding[] = []
|
|
const missingReasons: AnnotationMissingReasonFinding[] = []
|
|
let exemptions = 0
|
|
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < lines.length; i += 1) {
|
|
const line = lines[i] ?? ''
|
|
RAW_FETCH_PATTERN.lastIndex = 0
|
|
let match: RegExpExecArray | null
|
|
while ((match = RAW_FETCH_PATTERN.exec(line)) !== null) {
|
|
if (isContractFetchHelperCall(line, match.index)) continue
|
|
|
|
const annotation = extractAnnotation(content, i, 'raw-fetch')
|
|
if (annotation.missingReason) {
|
|
missingReasons.push({ path: relativePath, line: i + 1, kind: 'raw-fetch' })
|
|
findings.push({ path: relativePath, line: i + 1, preview: buildPreview(line) })
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
if (annotation.allowed) {
|
|
exemptions += 1
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
findings.push({ path: relativePath, line: i + 1, preview: buildPreview(line) })
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return { findings, exemptions, missingReasons }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function findDoubleCastFindings(
|
|
filePath: string,
|
|
content: string
|
|
): {
|
|
findings: DoubleCastFinding[]
|
|
exemptions: number
|
|
missingReasons: AnnotationMissingReasonFinding[]
|
|
} {
|
|
const relativePath = path.relative(ROOT, filePath)
|
|
const lines = content.split('\n')
|
|
const findings: DoubleCastFinding[] = []
|
|
const missingReasons: AnnotationMissingReasonFinding[] = []
|
|
let exemptions = 0
|
|
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < lines.length; i += 1) {
|
|
const line = lines[i] ?? ''
|
|
DOUBLE_CAST_PATTERN.lastIndex = 0
|
|
while (DOUBLE_CAST_PATTERN.exec(line) !== null) {
|
|
const annotation = extractAnnotation(content, i, 'double-cast')
|
|
if (annotation.missingReason) {
|
|
missingReasons.push({ path: relativePath, line: i + 1, kind: 'double-cast' })
|
|
findings.push({ path: relativePath, line: i + 1, preview: buildPreview(line) })
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
if (annotation.allowed) {
|
|
exemptions += 1
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
findings.push({ path: relativePath, line: i + 1, preview: buildPreview(line) })
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return { findings, exemptions, missingReasons }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Inspect a route file for `await request.json()` / `await req.json()` reads.
|
|
*
|
|
* Returns one finding per unannotated read. Routes in
|
|
* `RAW_JSON_BASELINE_ROUTES` are baseline-allowed: their reads still appear
|
|
* in `findings` so the `rawJsonReads` ratcheted metric counts them, but they
|
|
* are NOT required to carry per-line `// boundary-raw-json: <reason>`
|
|
* annotations. The ratchet's enforcement is by file count
|
|
* (see `buildBoundaryPolicyMetrics`): adding a raw read in a route outside
|
|
* the baseline pushes the unique-file count above `BOUNDARY_POLICY_BASELINE.rawJsonReads`.
|
|
*
|
|
* Annotated reads (`// boundary-raw-json: <reason>` on one of the three
|
|
* preceding non-empty lines) are treated as exemptions and excluded from
|
|
* `findings`. An annotation with the prefix but an empty reason is flagged
|
|
* via `missingReasons` and still counts as a finding.
|
|
*/
|
|
function findRawJsonFindings(
|
|
filePath: string,
|
|
content: string
|
|
): {
|
|
findings: RawJsonFinding[]
|
|
exemptions: number
|
|
missingReasons: AnnotationMissingReasonFinding[]
|
|
} {
|
|
const relativePath = path.relative(ROOT, filePath)
|
|
const lines = content.split('\n')
|
|
const findings: RawJsonFinding[] = []
|
|
const missingReasons: AnnotationMissingReasonFinding[] = []
|
|
let exemptions = 0
|
|
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < lines.length; i += 1) {
|
|
const line = lines[i] ?? ''
|
|
RAW_JSON_READ_PATTERN.lastIndex = 0
|
|
while (RAW_JSON_READ_PATTERN.exec(line) !== null) {
|
|
const annotation = extractAnnotation(content, i, 'raw-json')
|
|
if (annotation.missingReason) {
|
|
missingReasons.push({ path: relativePath, line: i + 1, kind: 'raw-json' })
|
|
findings.push({ path: relativePath, line: i + 1, preview: buildPreview(line) })
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
if (annotation.allowed) {
|
|
exemptions += 1
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
findings.push({ path: relativePath, line: i + 1, preview: buildPreview(line) })
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return { findings, exemptions, missingReasons }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Inspect a contracts file for "validates nothing" response schema
|
|
* declarations. Three forms are treated equivalently and all count toward
|
|
* the `untypedResponses` ratchet:
|
|
* - `schema: z.unknown()`
|
|
* - `schema: z.object({}).passthrough()`
|
|
* - `schema: z.record(z.string(), z.unknown())`
|
|
*
|
|
* Anchored on `schema:` so nested uses inside an otherwise-typed object
|
|
* (e.g. `output: z.unknown()` inside `z.object({ ... })`) are NOT flagged.
|
|
* Each callsite must carry a `// untyped-response: <reason>` annotation on
|
|
* one of the three preceding non-empty lines. Annotated callsites become
|
|
* exemptions; un-annotated callsites become findings that count toward the
|
|
* `untypedResponses` ratchet. An annotation with the prefix but an empty
|
|
* reason is flagged via `missingReasons` and still counts as a finding.
|
|
*/
|
|
function findUntypedResponseFindings(
|
|
filePath: string,
|
|
content: string
|
|
): {
|
|
findings: UntypedResponseFinding[]
|
|
exemptions: number
|
|
missingReasons: AnnotationMissingReasonFinding[]
|
|
} {
|
|
const relativePath = path.relative(ROOT, filePath)
|
|
const lines = content.split('\n')
|
|
const findings: UntypedResponseFinding[] = []
|
|
const missingReasons: AnnotationMissingReasonFinding[] = []
|
|
let exemptions = 0
|
|
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < lines.length; i += 1) {
|
|
const line = lines[i] ?? ''
|
|
UNTYPED_RESPONSE_PATTERN.lastIndex = 0
|
|
while (UNTYPED_RESPONSE_PATTERN.exec(line) !== null) {
|
|
const annotation = extractAnnotation(content, i, 'untyped-response')
|
|
if (annotation.missingReason) {
|
|
missingReasons.push({ path: relativePath, line: i + 1, kind: 'untyped-response' })
|
|
findings.push({ path: relativePath, line: i + 1, preview: buildPreview(line) })
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
if (annotation.allowed) {
|
|
exemptions += 1
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
findings.push({ path: relativePath, line: i + 1, preview: buildPreview(line) })
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return { findings, exemptions, missingReasons }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function isClientHookFile(filePath: string): boolean {
|
|
const normalized = filePath.replace(/\\/g, '/')
|
|
return (
|
|
normalized.startsWith(`${QUERY_HOOKS_DIR}/`) || normalized.startsWith(`${SELECTOR_HOOKS_DIR}/`)
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Identifies `apps/sim/app/api/**\/route.ts` API route handlers. Same-origin
|
|
* `/api/` fetch scanning skips these — server-side fetches from inside a
|
|
* route handler are a different concern and are not what this ratchet is
|
|
* trying to catch.
|
|
*/
|
|
function isApiRouteHandler(filePath: string): boolean {
|
|
const normalized = filePath.replace(/\\/g, '/')
|
|
if (!normalized.startsWith(`${API_DIR}/`)) return false
|
|
return normalized.endsWith('/route.ts')
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Inspect a non-API-route source file under `apps/sim/**` for raw
|
|
* `fetch('/api/...')`, `fetch("/api/...")`, or ``fetch(`/api/...`)`` calls.
|
|
*
|
|
* Each callsite is either an exemption (annotated with
|
|
* `// boundary-raw-fetch: <reason>` on one of the three preceding non-empty
|
|
* lines) or a finding. The ratchet's enforcement is by unique-file count:
|
|
* introducing a same-origin `/api/` fetch without an annotation pushes the
|
|
* unique-file count above `BOUNDARY_POLICY_BASELINE.clientSameOriginApiFetches`
|
|
* and fails the audit.
|
|
*
|
|
* Scanning runs over the entire file content (not line-by-line) so that
|
|
* multi-line constructs like `fetch(\n \`/api/...\`)` are still caught.
|
|
* An annotation with the prefix but an empty reason is flagged via
|
|
* `missingReasons` and still counts as a finding.
|
|
*/
|
|
function findSameOriginApiFetchFindings(
|
|
filePath: string,
|
|
content: string
|
|
): {
|
|
findings: SameOriginApiFetchFinding[]
|
|
exemptions: number
|
|
missingReasons: AnnotationMissingReasonFinding[]
|
|
} {
|
|
const relativePath = path.relative(ROOT, filePath)
|
|
const lines = content.split('\n')
|
|
const findings: SameOriginApiFetchFinding[] = []
|
|
const missingReasons: AnnotationMissingReasonFinding[] = []
|
|
let exemptions = 0
|
|
|
|
SAME_ORIGIN_API_FETCH_PATTERN.lastIndex = 0
|
|
let match: RegExpExecArray | null
|
|
while ((match = SAME_ORIGIN_API_FETCH_PATTERN.exec(content)) !== null) {
|
|
const lineNumber = lineNumberForIndex(content, match.index)
|
|
const lineIndex = lineNumber - 1
|
|
const line = lines[lineIndex] ?? ''
|
|
|
|
const annotation = extractAnnotation(content, lineIndex, 'raw-fetch')
|
|
if (annotation.missingReason) {
|
|
missingReasons.push({ path: relativePath, line: lineNumber, kind: 'raw-fetch' })
|
|
findings.push({ path: relativePath, line: lineNumber, preview: buildPreview(line) })
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
if (annotation.allowed) {
|
|
exemptions += 1
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
findings.push({ path: relativePath, line: lineNumber, preview: buildPreview(line) })
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return { findings, exemptions, missingReasons }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function routeFamily(routePath: string): string {
|
|
const relative = routePath.replace(/^apps\/sim\/app\/api\//, '')
|
|
const [first, second] = relative.split('/')
|
|
|
|
if (first === 'tools') return `tools/${second ?? 'unknown'}`
|
|
if (first === 'v1') return second ? `v1/${second}` : 'v1'
|
|
return first ?? 'unknown'
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function hasZodUsage(relativePath: string, content: string): boolean {
|
|
if (ZOD_IMPORT_PATTERN.test(content) || ZOD_REQUIRE_PATTERN.test(content)) {
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
/\bparseRequest\(/.test(content) &&
|
|
/\bfrom\s+['"]@\/lib\/api\/server['"]/.test(content) &&
|
|
CONTRACT_IMPORT_PATTERN.test(content)
|
|
) {
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
CONTRACT_IMPORT_PATTERN.test(content) &&
|
|
DECLARATIVE_ROUTE_BUILDER_IMPORT_PATTERN.test(content) &&
|
|
DECLARATIVE_ROUTE_BUILDER_USAGE_PATTERN.test(content)
|
|
) {
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
CONTRACT_IMPORT_PATTERN.test(content) &&
|
|
(SCHEMA_PARSE_PATTERN.test(content) || CONTRACT_MAP_PARSE_PATTERN.test(content))
|
|
) {
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
if (CONTRACT_IMPORT_PATTERN.test(content) && CONTRACT_SERVER_HELPER_PATTERN.test(content)) {
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
CONTRACT_IMPORT_PATTERN.test(content) &&
|
|
SERVER_VALIDATION_IMPORT_PATTERN.test(content) &&
|
|
CANONICAL_HELPER_USAGE_PATTERN.test(content)
|
|
) {
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
SERVER_VALIDATION_IMPORT_PATTERN.test(content) &&
|
|
/\b(?:isZodError|validationErrorResponseFromError)\b/.test(content) &&
|
|
SCHEMA_PARSE_PATTERN.test(content)
|
|
) {
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return INDIRECT_ZOD_ROUTES.has(relativePath)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function auditRoute(filePath: string, content: string): RouteAudit {
|
|
const relativePath = path.relative(ROOT, filePath)
|
|
const schemaConstructorCount = [...content.matchAll(ZOD_SCHEMA_CONSTRUCTOR_PATTERN)].length
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
path: relativePath,
|
|
usesZod: hasZodUsage(relativePath, content),
|
|
hasZodImport: ZOD_IMPORT_PATTERN.test(content) || ZOD_REQUIRE_PATTERN.test(content),
|
|
schemaConstructorCount,
|
|
hasZodErrorReference: ZOD_ERROR_PATTERN.test(content),
|
|
hasBodyRead: /\brequest\.json\(\)|\breq\.json\(\)/.test(content),
|
|
hasQueryRead: /\.searchParams\b|new URL\([^)]*\)\.searchParams/.test(content),
|
|
hasFormDataRead: /\.formData\(\)/.test(content),
|
|
hasParamsContext: /\bparams\b/.test(content) && /\bPromise<\{|\bRouteContext\b/.test(content),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function findAdHocWireTypes(filePath: string, content: string): WireTypeFinding[] {
|
|
const findings: WireTypeFinding[] = []
|
|
const relativePath = path.relative(ROOT, filePath)
|
|
|
|
for (const match of content.matchAll(WIRE_TYPE_DECLARATION_PATTERN)) {
|
|
const kind = match[1]
|
|
const name = match[2]
|
|
const declarationStart = match.index ?? 0
|
|
const declarationPreview = content.slice(declarationStart, declarationStart + 800)
|
|
|
|
if (name.endsWith('QueryResult')) continue
|
|
if (CONTRACT_DERIVED_WIRE_TYPE_PATTERN.test(declarationPreview)) continue
|
|
if (kind === 'type') {
|
|
const equalsIndex = declarationPreview.indexOf('=')
|
|
const typeBody = declarationPreview.slice(equalsIndex + 1).trimStart()
|
|
if (!typeBody.startsWith('{') && !/^[A-Z]\w*\s*&\s*\{/.test(typeBody)) {
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
findings.push({
|
|
path: relativePath,
|
|
name,
|
|
line: lineNumberForIndex(content, declarationStart),
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return findings
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function auditQueryHook(filePath: string, content: string): QueryHookAudit {
|
|
const relativePath = path.relative(ROOT, filePath)
|
|
const schemaConstructorCount = [...content.matchAll(ZOD_SCHEMA_CONSTRUCTOR_PATTERN)].length
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
path: relativePath,
|
|
hasZodImport: ZOD_IMPORT_PATTERN.test(content) || ZOD_REQUIRE_PATTERN.test(content),
|
|
schemaConstructorCount,
|
|
adHocWireTypes: findAdHocWireTypes(filePath, content),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function printFamilyStats(audits: RouteAudit[]) {
|
|
const families = new Map<string, FamilyStats>()
|
|
|
|
for (const audit of audits) {
|
|
const family = routeFamily(audit.path)
|
|
const stats = families.get(family) ?? { total: 0, zod: 0, nonZod: 0 }
|
|
stats.total += 1
|
|
if (audit.usesZod) {
|
|
stats.zod += 1
|
|
} else {
|
|
stats.nonZod += 1
|
|
}
|
|
families.set(family, stats)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.log('\nFamily breakdown:')
|
|
for (const [family, stats] of [...families.entries()].sort((a, b) => a[0].localeCompare(b[0]))) {
|
|
console.log(
|
|
` ${family.padEnd(32)} total=${String(stats.total).padStart(3)} zod=${String(stats.zod).padStart(3)} nonZod=${String(stats.nonZod).padStart(3)}`
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function printRiskyNonZodRoutes(audits: RouteAudit[]) {
|
|
const risky = audits.filter(
|
|
(audit) =>
|
|
!audit.usesZod &&
|
|
(audit.hasBodyRead || audit.hasQueryRead || audit.hasFormDataRead || audit.hasParamsContext)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
console.log(`\nNon-Zod routes with parsed inputs: ${risky.length}`)
|
|
for (const audit of risky.slice(0, 50)) {
|
|
const markers = [
|
|
audit.hasBodyRead ? 'json' : null,
|
|
audit.hasFormDataRead ? 'formData' : null,
|
|
audit.hasQueryRead ? 'query' : null,
|
|
audit.hasParamsContext ? 'params' : null,
|
|
].filter(Boolean)
|
|
console.log(` ${audit.path} (${markers.join(', ')})`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (risky.length > 50) {
|
|
console.log(` ... ${risky.length - 50} more`)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function printAllNonZodRoutes(audits: RouteAudit[]) {
|
|
if (!process.argv.includes('--list-non-zod')) return
|
|
|
|
const nonZod = audits.filter((audit) => !audit.usesZod)
|
|
|
|
console.log(`\nAll non-Zod routes: ${nonZod.length}`)
|
|
for (const audit of nonZod) {
|
|
const markers = [
|
|
audit.hasBodyRead ? 'json' : null,
|
|
audit.hasFormDataRead ? 'formData' : null,
|
|
audit.hasQueryRead ? 'query' : null,
|
|
audit.hasParamsContext ? 'params' : null,
|
|
].filter(Boolean)
|
|
console.log(` ${audit.path}${markers.length > 0 ? ` (${markers.join(', ')})` : ''}`)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function buildBoundaryPolicyMetrics(
|
|
routeAudits: RouteAudit[],
|
|
queryHookAudits: QueryHookAudit[],
|
|
rawFetchSummary: { findings: RawFetchFinding[]; exemptions: number },
|
|
sameOriginApiFetchSummary: {
|
|
findings: SameOriginApiFetchFinding[]
|
|
exemptions: number
|
|
},
|
|
doubleCastSummary: { findings: DoubleCastFinding[]; exemptions: number },
|
|
rawJsonSummary: { findings: RawJsonFinding[]; exemptions: number },
|
|
untypedResponseSummary: { findings: UntypedResponseFinding[]; exemptions: number },
|
|
annotationsMissingReason: AnnotationMissingReasonFinding[]
|
|
): {
|
|
ratchetedMetrics: BoundaryPolicyMetric[]
|
|
printOnlyMetrics: PrintOnlyBoundaryPolicyMetric[]
|
|
} {
|
|
const routeZodImports = routeAudits.filter((audit) => audit.hasZodImport)
|
|
const routeLocalSchemaRoutes = routeAudits.filter((audit) => audit.schemaConstructorCount > 0)
|
|
const routeLocalSchemaConstructors = routeLocalSchemaRoutes.reduce(
|
|
(total, audit) => total + audit.schemaConstructorCount,
|
|
0
|
|
)
|
|
const routeZodErrorReferences = routeAudits.filter((audit) => audit.hasZodErrorReference)
|
|
const queryHookZodImports = queryHookAudits.filter((audit) => audit.hasZodImport)
|
|
const queryHookLocalSchemaFiles = queryHookAudits.filter(
|
|
(audit) => audit.schemaConstructorCount > 0
|
|
)
|
|
const queryHookLocalSchemaConstructors = queryHookLocalSchemaFiles.reduce(
|
|
(total, audit) => total + audit.schemaConstructorCount,
|
|
0
|
|
)
|
|
const queryHookAdHocWireTypes = queryHookAudits.flatMap((audit) => audit.adHocWireTypes)
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
ratchetedMetrics: [
|
|
{
|
|
key: 'routeZodImports',
|
|
label: 'route files importing zod',
|
|
current: routeZodImports.length,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
key: 'routeLocalSchemaRoutes',
|
|
label: 'route files with local schema constructors',
|
|
current: routeLocalSchemaRoutes.length,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
key: 'routeLocalSchemaConstructors',
|
|
label: 'route local schema constructor calls',
|
|
current: routeLocalSchemaConstructors,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
key: 'routeZodErrorReferences',
|
|
label: 'route files referencing ZodError',
|
|
current: routeZodErrorReferences.length,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
key: 'clientHookZodImports',
|
|
label: 'client hook files importing zod',
|
|
current: queryHookZodImports.length,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
key: 'clientHookLocalSchemaFiles',
|
|
label: 'client hook files with local schema constructors',
|
|
current: queryHookLocalSchemaFiles.length,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
key: 'clientHookLocalSchemaConstructors',
|
|
label: 'client hook local schema constructor calls',
|
|
current: queryHookLocalSchemaConstructors,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
key: 'clientHookRawFetches',
|
|
label: 'client hook raw fetch() calls',
|
|
current: rawFetchSummary.findings.length,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
key: 'clientSameOriginApiFetches',
|
|
label: 'apps/sim files with raw same-origin /api/ fetch() calls',
|
|
current: new Set(sameOriginApiFetchSummary.findings.map((finding) => finding.path)).size,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
key: 'doubleCasts',
|
|
label: 'as unknown as double-casts (non-test)',
|
|
current: doubleCastSummary.findings.length,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
key: 'rawJsonReads',
|
|
label: 'route files with raw await request.json() reads',
|
|
current: new Set(rawJsonSummary.findings.map((finding) => finding.path)).size,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
key: 'untypedResponses',
|
|
label:
|
|
'contract untyped response schemas (z.unknown / z.object({}).passthrough / z.record)',
|
|
current: untypedResponseSummary.findings.length,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
key: 'annotationsMissingReason',
|
|
label: 'audit annotations missing reason',
|
|
current: annotationsMissingReason.length,
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
printOnlyMetrics: [
|
|
{
|
|
label: 'client hook ad-hoc wire Response/Result types',
|
|
current: queryHookAdHocWireTypes.length,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: 'client hook raw fetch() exemptions (annotated)',
|
|
current: rawFetchSummary.exemptions,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: 'apps/sim raw same-origin /api/ fetch() callsites',
|
|
current: sameOriginApiFetchSummary.findings.length,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: 'apps/sim raw same-origin /api/ fetch() exemptions (annotated)',
|
|
current: sameOriginApiFetchSummary.exemptions,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: 'as unknown as double-cast exemptions (annotated)',
|
|
current: doubleCastSummary.exemptions,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: 'route raw await request.json() annotated exemptions',
|
|
current: rawJsonSummary.exemptions,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
label: 'contract untyped response annotated exemptions',
|
|
current: untypedResponseSummary.exemptions,
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function printBoundaryPolicyMetric(metric: BoundaryPolicyMetric) {
|
|
const baseline = BOUNDARY_POLICY_BASELINE[metric.key]
|
|
const delta = metric.current - baseline
|
|
const deltaText = delta === 0 ? 'at baseline' : `${delta > 0 ? '+' : ''}${delta} vs baseline`
|
|
console.log(` ${metric.label}: ${metric.current} (${deltaText})`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function printRawFetchAndDoubleCastMetrics(
|
|
rawFetchFindings: RawFetchFinding[],
|
|
sameOriginApiFetchFindings: SameOriginApiFetchFinding[],
|
|
doubleCastFindings: DoubleCastFinding[],
|
|
rawJsonFindings: RawJsonFinding[],
|
|
untypedResponseFindings: UntypedResponseFinding[],
|
|
annotationsMissingReason: AnnotationMissingReasonFinding[],
|
|
rawFetchExemptions: number,
|
|
sameOriginApiFetchExemptions: number,
|
|
doubleCastExemptions: number,
|
|
rawJsonExemptions: number,
|
|
untypedResponseExemptions: number
|
|
) {
|
|
console.log('\nRaw fetch and double-cast metrics:')
|
|
console.log(` client hook raw fetch() calls: ${rawFetchFindings.length}`)
|
|
console.log(` client hook raw fetch() exemptions (annotated): ${rawFetchExemptions}`)
|
|
const sameOriginFiles = new Set(sameOriginApiFetchFindings.map((finding) => finding.path)).size
|
|
console.log(
|
|
` apps/sim files with raw same-origin /api/ fetch() calls: ${sameOriginFiles} (baseline ${BOUNDARY_POLICY_BASELINE.clientSameOriginApiFetches})`
|
|
)
|
|
console.log(
|
|
` apps/sim raw same-origin /api/ fetch() callsites: ${sameOriginApiFetchFindings.length}`
|
|
)
|
|
console.log(
|
|
` apps/sim raw same-origin /api/ fetch() exemptions (annotated): ${sameOriginApiFetchExemptions}`
|
|
)
|
|
console.log(` as unknown as double-casts (non-test): ${doubleCastFindings.length}`)
|
|
console.log(` as unknown as double-cast exemptions (annotated): ${doubleCastExemptions}`)
|
|
const rawJsonFiles = new Set(rawJsonFindings.map((finding) => finding.path)).size
|
|
console.log(
|
|
` route files with raw await request.json() reads: ${rawJsonFiles} (baseline ${BOUNDARY_POLICY_BASELINE.rawJsonReads})`
|
|
)
|
|
console.log(` route raw await request.json() reads (callsites): ${rawJsonFindings.length}`)
|
|
console.log(` route raw await request.json() annotated exemptions: ${rawJsonExemptions}`)
|
|
console.log(
|
|
` contract untyped response schemas (z.unknown / z.object({}).passthrough / z.record): ${untypedResponseFindings.length}`
|
|
)
|
|
console.log(` contract untyped response annotated exemptions: ${untypedResponseExemptions}`)
|
|
console.log(` audit annotations missing reason: ${annotationsMissingReason.length}`)
|
|
|
|
console.log(' raw fetch examples:')
|
|
for (const finding of rawFetchFindings.slice(0, 25)) {
|
|
console.log(` ${finding.path}:${finding.line} ${finding.preview}`)
|
|
}
|
|
if (rawFetchFindings.length > 25) {
|
|
console.log(` ... ${rawFetchFindings.length - 25} more`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.log(' same-origin /api/ fetch examples:')
|
|
for (const finding of sameOriginApiFetchFindings.slice(0, 25)) {
|
|
console.log(` ${finding.path}:${finding.line} ${finding.preview}`)
|
|
}
|
|
if (sameOriginApiFetchFindings.length > 25) {
|
|
console.log(` ... ${sameOriginApiFetchFindings.length - 25} more`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.log(' double-cast examples:')
|
|
for (const finding of doubleCastFindings.slice(0, 25)) {
|
|
console.log(` ${finding.path}:${finding.line} ${finding.preview}`)
|
|
}
|
|
if (doubleCastFindings.length > 25) {
|
|
console.log(` ... ${doubleCastFindings.length - 25} more`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.log(' raw await request.json() examples:')
|
|
for (const finding of rawJsonFindings.slice(0, 25)) {
|
|
console.log(` ${finding.path}:${finding.line} ${finding.preview}`)
|
|
}
|
|
if (rawJsonFindings.length > 25) {
|
|
console.log(` ... ${rawJsonFindings.length - 25} more`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.log(' untyped response schema examples:')
|
|
for (const finding of untypedResponseFindings.slice(0, 25)) {
|
|
console.log(` ${finding.path}:${finding.line} ${finding.preview}`)
|
|
}
|
|
if (untypedResponseFindings.length > 25) {
|
|
console.log(` ... ${untypedResponseFindings.length - 25} more`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.log(' annotations missing reason (must be 0 for --enforce-boundary-baseline):')
|
|
for (const finding of annotationsMissingReason.slice(0, 25)) {
|
|
console.log(` ${finding.path}:${finding.line} (${finding.kind})`)
|
|
}
|
|
if (annotationsMissingReason.length > 25) {
|
|
console.log(` ... ${annotationsMissingReason.length - 25} more`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.log(
|
|
' annotation forms: `// boundary-raw-fetch: <reason>` (raw fetch in client hook OR same-origin /api/ fetch outside an API route handler), `// double-cast-allowed: <reason>` (double-cast), `// boundary-raw-json: <reason>` (raw request.json read), `// untyped-response: <reason>` (z.unknown() / z.object({}).passthrough() / z.record(z.string(), z.unknown()) response schema)'
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function printBoundaryContractDrift(
|
|
routeAudits: RouteAudit[],
|
|
queryHookAudits: QueryHookAudit[],
|
|
sameOriginApiFetchFindings: SameOriginApiFetchFinding[],
|
|
untypedResponseFindings: UntypedResponseFinding[],
|
|
ratchetedMetrics: BoundaryPolicyMetric[],
|
|
printOnlyMetrics: PrintOnlyBoundaryPolicyMetric[]
|
|
) {
|
|
const zodImportRoutes = routeAudits.filter((audit) => audit.hasZodImport)
|
|
const localSchemaRoutes = routeAudits.filter((audit) => audit.schemaConstructorCount > 0)
|
|
const zodErrorRoutes = routeAudits.filter((audit) => audit.hasZodErrorReference)
|
|
const zodImportQueryHooks = queryHookAudits.filter((audit) => audit.hasZodImport)
|
|
const localSchemaQueryHooks = queryHookAudits.filter((audit) => audit.schemaConstructorCount > 0)
|
|
const adHocWireTypes = queryHookAudits.flatMap((audit) => audit.adHocWireTypes)
|
|
const sameOriginApiFetchFiles = [
|
|
...new Set(sameOriginApiFetchFindings.map((finding) => finding.path)),
|
|
].sort()
|
|
|
|
console.log('\nBoundary policy drift:')
|
|
console.log(' ratcheted metrics:')
|
|
for (const metric of ratchetedMetrics) {
|
|
printBoundaryPolicyMetric(metric)
|
|
}
|
|
console.log(' print-only heuristics:')
|
|
for (const metric of printOnlyMetrics) {
|
|
console.log(` ${metric.label}: ${metric.current}`)
|
|
}
|
|
console.log(
|
|
' ratchet enforcement: pass --enforce-boundary-baseline to fail on ratcheted metric increases'
|
|
)
|
|
console.log(' ratchet update: lower BOUNDARY_POLICY_BASELINE after reducing a ratcheted count')
|
|
|
|
console.log('\nBoundary policy examples:')
|
|
console.log(' route zod import examples:')
|
|
for (const audit of zodImportRoutes.slice(0, 25)) {
|
|
console.log(` ${audit.path}`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (zodImportRoutes.length > 25) {
|
|
console.log(` ... ${zodImportRoutes.length - 25} more`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.log(' route local schema constructor examples:')
|
|
for (const audit of localSchemaRoutes.slice(0, 25)) {
|
|
console.log(` ${audit.path} (${audit.schemaConstructorCount})`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (localSchemaRoutes.length > 25) {
|
|
console.log(` ... ${localSchemaRoutes.length - 25} more`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.log(' route ZodError reference examples:')
|
|
for (const audit of zodErrorRoutes.slice(0, 25)) {
|
|
console.log(` ${audit.path}`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (zodErrorRoutes.length > 25) {
|
|
console.log(` ... ${zodErrorRoutes.length - 25} more`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.log(' client hook zod import examples:')
|
|
for (const audit of zodImportQueryHooks.slice(0, 25)) {
|
|
console.log(` ${audit.path}`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (zodImportQueryHooks.length > 25) {
|
|
console.log(` ... ${zodImportQueryHooks.length - 25} more`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.log(' query-hook local schema constructor examples:')
|
|
for (const audit of localSchemaQueryHooks.slice(0, 25)) {
|
|
console.log(` ${audit.path} (${audit.schemaConstructorCount})`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (localSchemaQueryHooks.length > 25) {
|
|
console.log(` ... ${localSchemaQueryHooks.length - 25} more`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.log(' query-hook ad-hoc wire type examples:')
|
|
for (const finding of adHocWireTypes.slice(0, 25)) {
|
|
console.log(` ${finding.path}:${finding.line} ${finding.name}`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (adHocWireTypes.length > 25) {
|
|
console.log(` ... ${adHocWireTypes.length - 25} more`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.log(' apps/sim same-origin /api/ fetch file examples:')
|
|
for (const filePath of sameOriginApiFetchFiles.slice(0, 25)) {
|
|
console.log(` ${filePath}`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (sameOriginApiFetchFiles.length > 25) {
|
|
console.log(` ... ${sameOriginApiFetchFiles.length - 25} more`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.log(' contract untyped response schema examples:')
|
|
for (const finding of untypedResponseFindings.slice(0, 25)) {
|
|
console.log(` ${finding.path}:${finding.line} ${finding.preview}`)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (untypedResponseFindings.length > 25) {
|
|
console.log(` ... ${untypedResponseFindings.length - 25} more`)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function boundaryPolicyFailures(metrics: BoundaryPolicyMetric[]): string[] {
|
|
return metrics
|
|
.filter((metric) => metric.current > BOUNDARY_POLICY_BASELINE[metric.key])
|
|
.map(
|
|
(metric) =>
|
|
`${metric.label} increased from ${BOUNDARY_POLICY_BASELINE[metric.key]} to ${metric.current}`
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function auditQueryHooks(): Promise<QueryHookAudit[]> {
|
|
const queryHookFiles = await walk(
|
|
QUERY_HOOKS_DIR,
|
|
(fileName) => /\.(ts|tsx)$/.test(fileName) && !/\.test\.(ts|tsx)$/.test(fileName)
|
|
)
|
|
const audits: QueryHookAudit[] = []
|
|
|
|
for (const filePath of queryHookFiles) {
|
|
const content = await readFile(filePath, 'utf8')
|
|
audits.push(auditQueryHook(filePath, content))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return audits
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function main() {
|
|
const checkOnly = process.argv.includes('--check')
|
|
const enforceBoundaryBaseline = process.argv.includes('--enforce-boundary-baseline')
|
|
const routeFiles = await walk(API_DIR, (fileName) => fileName === 'route.ts')
|
|
const audits: RouteAudit[] = []
|
|
const rawJsonFindings: RawJsonFinding[] = []
|
|
const annotationsMissingReason: AnnotationMissingReasonFinding[] = []
|
|
let rawJsonExemptions = 0
|
|
|
|
for (const filePath of routeFiles) {
|
|
const content = await readFile(filePath, 'utf8')
|
|
audits.push(auditRoute(filePath, content))
|
|
|
|
const rawJson = findRawJsonFindings(filePath, content)
|
|
rawJsonFindings.push(...rawJson.findings)
|
|
rawJsonExemptions += rawJson.exemptions
|
|
annotationsMissingReason.push(...rawJson.missingReasons)
|
|
}
|
|
const queryHookAudits = await auditQueryHooks()
|
|
|
|
const sourceFiles = await walkAllSourceFiles(ROOT, true)
|
|
const rawFetchFindings: RawFetchFinding[] = []
|
|
const sameOriginApiFetchFindings: SameOriginApiFetchFinding[] = []
|
|
const doubleCastFindings: DoubleCastFinding[] = []
|
|
let rawFetchExemptions = 0
|
|
let sameOriginApiFetchExemptions = 0
|
|
let doubleCastExemptions = 0
|
|
|
|
const appsSimRoot = path.join(ROOT, 'apps/sim')
|
|
|
|
for (const filePath of sourceFiles) {
|
|
const content = await readFile(filePath, 'utf8')
|
|
const normalized = filePath.replace(/\\/g, '/')
|
|
|
|
if (isClientHookFile(filePath)) {
|
|
const rawFetch = findRawFetchFindings(filePath, content)
|
|
rawFetchFindings.push(...rawFetch.findings)
|
|
rawFetchExemptions += rawFetch.exemptions
|
|
annotationsMissingReason.push(...rawFetch.missingReasons)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
normalized.startsWith(`${appsSimRoot}/`) &&
|
|
!isApiRouteHandler(filePath) &&
|
|
filePath !== path.join(ROOT, 'scripts', 'check-api-validation-contracts.ts')
|
|
) {
|
|
const sameOrigin = findSameOriginApiFetchFindings(filePath, content)
|
|
sameOriginApiFetchFindings.push(...sameOrigin.findings)
|
|
sameOriginApiFetchExemptions += sameOrigin.exemptions
|
|
annotationsMissingReason.push(...sameOrigin.missingReasons)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const doubleCast = findDoubleCastFindings(filePath, content)
|
|
doubleCastFindings.push(...doubleCast.findings)
|
|
doubleCastExemptions += doubleCast.exemptions
|
|
annotationsMissingReason.push(...doubleCast.missingReasons)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const contractFiles = await walk(CONTRACTS_DIR, (fileName) => /\.ts$/.test(fileName))
|
|
const untypedResponseFindings: UntypedResponseFinding[] = []
|
|
let untypedResponseExemptions = 0
|
|
|
|
for (const filePath of contractFiles) {
|
|
const content = await readFile(filePath, 'utf8')
|
|
const untyped = findUntypedResponseFindings(filePath, content)
|
|
untypedResponseFindings.push(...untyped.findings)
|
|
untypedResponseExemptions += untyped.exemptions
|
|
annotationsMissingReason.push(...untyped.missingReasons)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const { ratchetedMetrics, printOnlyMetrics } = buildBoundaryPolicyMetrics(
|
|
audits,
|
|
queryHookAudits,
|
|
{ findings: rawFetchFindings, exemptions: rawFetchExemptions },
|
|
{
|
|
findings: sameOriginApiFetchFindings,
|
|
exemptions: sameOriginApiFetchExemptions,
|
|
},
|
|
{ findings: doubleCastFindings, exemptions: doubleCastExemptions },
|
|
{ findings: rawJsonFindings, exemptions: rawJsonExemptions },
|
|
{ findings: untypedResponseFindings, exemptions: untypedResponseExemptions },
|
|
annotationsMissingReason
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
const totalRoutes = audits.length
|
|
const zodRoutes = audits.filter((audit) => audit.usesZod).length
|
|
const nonZodRoutes = totalRoutes - zodRoutes
|
|
|
|
console.log('API validation route audit')
|
|
console.log(` total routes: ${totalRoutes}`)
|
|
console.log(` Zod-backed routes: ${zodRoutes}`)
|
|
console.log(` non-Zod routes: ${nonZodRoutes}`)
|
|
console.log(
|
|
` baseline: total=${BASELINE.totalRoutes} zod=${BASELINE.zodRoutes} nonZod=${BASELINE.nonZodRoutes}`
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
printFamilyStats(audits)
|
|
printRiskyNonZodRoutes(audits)
|
|
printAllNonZodRoutes(audits)
|
|
printBoundaryContractDrift(
|
|
audits,
|
|
queryHookAudits,
|
|
sameOriginApiFetchFindings,
|
|
untypedResponseFindings,
|
|
ratchetedMetrics,
|
|
printOnlyMetrics
|
|
)
|
|
printRawFetchAndDoubleCastMetrics(
|
|
rawFetchFindings,
|
|
sameOriginApiFetchFindings,
|
|
doubleCastFindings,
|
|
rawJsonFindings,
|
|
untypedResponseFindings,
|
|
annotationsMissingReason,
|
|
rawFetchExemptions,
|
|
sameOriginApiFetchExemptions,
|
|
doubleCastExemptions,
|
|
rawJsonExemptions,
|
|
untypedResponseExemptions
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if (!checkOnly) return
|
|
|
|
const failures: string[] = []
|
|
if (nonZodRoutes > BASELINE.nonZodRoutes) {
|
|
failures.push(
|
|
`non-Zod routes increased from ${BASELINE.nonZodRoutes} to ${nonZodRoutes} (${zodRoutes} Zod-backed routes)`
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
if (enforceBoundaryBaseline) {
|
|
failures.push(...boundaryPolicyFailures(ratchetedMetrics))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (failures.length > 0) {
|
|
console.error('\nAPI validation audit failed:')
|
|
for (const failure of failures) {
|
|
console.error(` - ${failure}`)
|
|
}
|
|
process.exit(1)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.log('\nAPI validation audit passed.')
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void main().catch((error) => {
|
|
console.error('API validation audit failed:', error)
|
|
process.exit(1)
|
|
})
|