From d4b4b3c55c19b268a73897ded33de71aeab78193 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Moore <93556950+JMoooore@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:49:58 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] fix: grammars (#4989)

Proper and consistent styling
---
 .../code-review/content/103-implementation-semantics.md     | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/data/roadmaps/code-review/content/103-implementation-semantics.md b/src/data/roadmaps/code-review/content/103-implementation-semantics.md
index 4e0757b7e..182d9926b 100644
--- a/src/data/roadmaps/code-review/content/103-implementation-semantics.md
+++ b/src/data/roadmaps/code-review/content/103-implementation-semantics.md
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
 - Does it satisfy the original requirements?
 - Is it logically correct?
 - Is there no unnecessary complexity?
-- Is it robust (no concurrency issues, proper error handling, etc.)?
+- Is it robust (i.e., no concurrency issues, proper error handling, etc.)?
 - Is it performant?
-- Is it secure e.g., no SQL injections, etc?
-- Is it observable e.g., metrics, logging, tracing, etc.?
+- Is it secure (i.e., no SQL injections, etc.)?
+- Is it observable (i.e., metrics, logging, tracing, etc.)?
 - Do newly added dependencies pull their weight? Is their license acceptable?