`POST /oauth2/register` (RFC 7591 Dynamic Client Registration) has exactly one gate today: `ExperimentOAuth2`, a static, process-lifetime flag that wraps the entire `/oauth2/*` route tree as an all-or-nothing switch. That flag is scheduled for removal at GA, which would leave DCR with zero admin control at all once it is gone. Add a persistent, DCR-specific `oauth2_dcr_enabled` deployment setting, independent of the experiment system, so admin control over DCR survives GA. `POST /oauth2/register` checks the flag and rejects new registrations with an RFC 7591-shaped `403` when disabled; discovery metadata (`GET /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server`) conditionally omits `registration_endpoint`. A new audited `GET`/`PUT /api/v2/oauth2-provider/settings` endpoint lets an owner toggle it live, no restart required. The setting defaults to disabled, matching the canonical design proposal; disabling only stops new self-registrations, clients that already registered continue to authorize and exchange tokens normally. Address issue described in [ENG-3056](https://linear.app/codercom/issue/ENG-3056/oauth2-dcr-admin-configurable-enabledisable). ## Where this sits in the request path ```mermaid sequenceDiagram autonumber participant A as Admin participant S as coderd participant DB as site_configs<br/>(oauth2_dcr_enabled) participant C as OAuth2/MCP Client Note over A,S: Admin toggles DCR (new) A->>S: PUT /api/v2/oauth2-provider/settings<br/>{dynamic_client_registration_enabled: false} S->>S: authorizeContext(ActionUpdate, ResourceDeploymentConfig) S->>DB: UPSERT oauth2_dcr_enabled = false S-->>A: 200 OK (audited) Note over C,S: Client discovery + registration afterward C->>S: GET /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server S->>DB: GetOAuth2DCREnabled (system ctx, every request, no cache) DB-->>S: false S-->>C: 200 metadata, registration_endpoint omitted C->>S: POST /oauth2/register S->>DB: GetOAuth2DCREnabled (system ctx, every request, no cache) DB-->>S: false S-->>C: 403 invalid_request,<br/>"Dynamic client registration is disabled" Note over C,S: A client that registered before the change is unaffected C->>S: GET /oauth2/authorize?client_id=... Note over S: no DCR-enabled check on this path S-->>C: 200 (proceeds normally) C->>S: PUT/DELETE /oauth2/clients/{client_id} (RFC 7592 self-management) Note over S: no DCR-enabled check on this path either S-->>C: 200 (proceeds normally) ``` ## Files changed: manual vs. generated Reviewers should focus on the **manual** files. The **generated** ones are `make gen` output that follows mechanically from the manual changes and don't need direct review. <details> <summary><b>Manual files (26)</b> — click to expand, grouped the same way as "Suggested review order" below</summary> **1. Database** | File | What changed | |---|---| | `coderd/database/queries/siteconfig.sql` | New `GetOAuth2DCREnabled`/`UpsertOAuth2DCREnabled` query pair on the existing generic `site_configs` table. No schema change. | | `coderd/database/dbauthz/dbauthz.go` | RBAC check (`rbac.ResourceDeploymentConfig`) on the two new query methods; extends the `subjectSystemOAuth2` system-actor role with read-only `ResourceDeploymentConfig` access, needed so the public discovery/registration endpoints can read the flag via `dbauthz.AsSystemOAuth2`. | | `coderd/database/dbauthz/dbauthz_test.go` | RBAC assertion coverage for `GetOAuth2DCREnabled`/`UpsertOAuth2DCREnabled` in the method-coverage test suite. | **2. Request gating (the actual feature)** | File | What changed | |---|---| | `coderd/oauth2provider/registration.go` | The actual gate: `CreateDynamicClientRegistration` reads the flag first and returns an RFC 7591-shaped `403` when disabled (defaults disabled if never configured). | | `coderd/oauth2provider/registration_test.go` | New unit test, `TestCreateDynamicClientRegistration_DCREnabled`: calls the handler directly (no HTTP server), covering enabled / explicitly disabled / never-configured. | | `coderd/oauth2provider/metadata.go` | `GetAuthorizationServerMetadata` conditionally omits `registration_endpoint` from discovery metadata when DCR is disabled. | | `coderd/oauth2provider/metadata_test.go` | New unit test, `TestGetAuthorizationServerMetadata_DCREnabled`: same three states, for the discovery handler. | **3. Admin settings endpoint** | File | What changed | |---|---| | `codersdk/oauth2.go` | New `OAuth2ProviderSettings` SDK type plus `Client.OAuth2ProviderSettings`/`PutOAuth2ProviderSettings` methods. | | `coderd/oauth2.go` | New `oauth2ProviderSettings`/`putOAuth2ProviderSettings` admin handlers (audited via `audit.InitRequest`); updates the `GetAuthorizationServerMetadata` call site to pass `api.Database`. | | `coderd/coderd.go` | Registers `GET`/`PUT /api/v2/oauth2-provider/settings`. | | `coderd/oauth2_provider_settings_test.go` | New test file: admin `GET`/`PUT` round-trip, default-disabled-before-any-`PUT`, and `403` for a non-owner on both `GET` and `PUT`. | **4. Audit wiring** | File | What changed | |---|---| | `coderd/database/types.go` | New `database.OAuth2ProviderSettings` audit-only struct (mirrors `NotificationsSettings`). | | `coderd/audit/diff.go` | Adds the new struct to the `Auditable` type union. | | `coderd/audit/request.go` | Adds the new struct to all four dispatch switches (`ResourceTarget`, `ResourceID`, `ResourceType`, `ResourceRequiresOrgID`). | | `codersdk/audit.go` | New API-facing `ResourceTypeOAuth2ProviderSettings` constant and its `FriendlyString` case. | | `enterprise/audit/table.go` | Field-level audit action map (`ActionTrack`/`ActionIgnore`) for the new struct. | | `coderd/database/migrations/000546_audit_oauth2_provider_settings.up.sql` | Adds `oauth2_provider_settings` to the `resource_type` Postgres enum, required for the audit wiring above (`resource_type` is a real enum, not a Go-only value). | | `coderd/database/migrations/000546_audit_oauth2_provider_settings.down.sql` | No-op (`ALTER TYPE ... ADD VALUE` can't be reverted). | **5. Test-suite ripple from the disabled-by-default flip** | File | What changed | |---|---| | `coderd/oauth2provider/oauth2providertest/helpers.go` | New shared test helper, `EnableDCR`, since DCR now defaults to disabled and many pre-existing tests need it turned on to register a client. | | `coderd/oauth2_test.go` | Adds `TestOAuth2DynamicClientRegistrationDisabled` (registers a client, disables DCR, verifies new registration is rejected while the existing client's self-management, authorize, and token exchange all keep working); calls `EnableDCR` in every pre-existing test that registers a client. | | `coderd/oauth2_error_compliance_test.go` | Calls `EnableDCR` in every test that registers a client, so RFC-error-format assertions aren't masked by the new disabled-by-default gate. | | `coderd/oauth2_metadata_validation_test.go` | Same: `EnableDCR` added to every registration-dependent test. | | `coderd/oauth2_security_test.go` | Same. | | `coderd/oauth2provider/validation_test.go` | Same (near-duplicate of `oauth2_metadata_validation_test.go` in a different package). | | `coderd/oauth2provider/provider_test.go` | Same. | | `coderd/mcp/mcp_e2e_test.go` | Same, for the MCP end-to-end dynamic-registration flow test. | </details> <details> <summary><b>Generated files (12)</b> — from <code>make gen</code>, no need to review directly</summary> `coderd/apidoc/docs.go`, `coderd/apidoc/swagger.json`, `coderd/database/dbmetrics/querymetrics.go`, `coderd/database/dbmock/dbmock.go`, `coderd/database/dump.sql`, `coderd/database/models.go`, `coderd/database/querier.go`, `coderd/database/queries.sql.go`, `docs/admin/security/audit-logs.md`, `docs/reference/api/enterprise.md`, `docs/reference/api/schemas.md`, `site/src/api/typesGenerated.ts`. </details> ## Suggested review order ### 1. Database Establishes the persisted setting and its RBAC rule; everything else builds on `GetOAuth2DCREnabled`/`UpsertOAuth2DCREnabled`. 1. `coderd/database/queries/siteconfig.sql` — the two new queries. Same boolean-encoding pattern as the existing `oauth2_github_default_eligible` key right above them in the same file. 2. `coderd/database/dbauthz/dbauthz.go` — the RBAC wrapper for those two queries, plus the `subjectSystemOAuth2` role extension (search this file for `ResourceDeploymentConfig`, it appears in both spots). 3. `coderd/database/dbauthz/dbauthz_test.go` — asserts the RBAC checks from (2) actually fire. ### 2. Request gating (the actual feature) Where `POST /oauth2/register` and discovery metadata change behavior. 1. `coderd/oauth2provider/registration.go` — the primary gate. Read this first; it's the feature. 2. `coderd/oauth2provider/registration_test.go` — its new unit test, exercising the gate's three states directly against the handler. 3. `coderd/oauth2provider/metadata.go` — the same gating pattern applied to the discovery `GET` endpoint. 4. `coderd/oauth2provider/metadata_test.go` — its new unit test. ### 3. Admin settings endpoint How an owner flips the setting live. 1. `codersdk/oauth2.go` — the `OAuth2ProviderSettings` SDK type and `Client` methods first; this is the public contract everything below implements against. 2. `coderd/oauth2.go` — the `GET`/`PUT` handlers themselves. 3. `coderd/coderd.go` — route registration, to see where those handlers get wired in. 4. `coderd/oauth2_provider_settings_test.go` — round-trip and permission tests. ### 4. Audit wiring Plumbing required so step 3's `PUT` is auditable; mechanical except for (3). 1. `coderd/database/types.go` — the audit-only struct; everything else in this layer exists to plumb it through. 2. `coderd/audit/diff.go` — adds it to the `Auditable` type union (the compiler enforces this one). 3. `coderd/audit/request.go` — the four dispatch switches; the one part of this layer worth reading closely. 4. `codersdk/audit.go` — the API-facing resource type constant. 5. `enterprise/audit/table.go` — the field-action map. 6. `coderd/database/migrations/000546_audit_oauth2_provider_settings.{up,down}.sql` — read last; a consequence of needing a new `resource_type` enum value for (1)-(5), not a design decision of its own. ### 5. Test-suite ripple from the disabled-by-default flip 1. `coderd/oauth2provider/oauth2providertest/helpers.go` — the new `EnableDCR` helper. Read first to understand the fix pattern before seeing it applied repeatedly. 2. `coderd/oauth2_test.go` — next, since it also contains the new `TestOAuth2DynamicClientRegistrationDisabled`, not just `EnableDCR` call sites. 3. The rest, in any order, they're mechanical repeats of the same one-line addition: `coderd/oauth2_error_compliance_test.go`, `coderd/oauth2_metadata_validation_test.go`, `coderd/oauth2_security_test.go`, `coderd/oauth2provider/validation_test.go`, `coderd/oauth2provider/provider_test.go`, `coderd/mcp/mcp_e2e_test.go`. ## Explicitly out of scope Per the design proposal: rate limiting on `POST /oauth2/register` (tracked separately), retroactively affecting already-registered clients when DCR is disabled (this only gates new self-registration), and an Initial Access Token requirement (a separate, follow-up ticket).
About
Coder is a self-hosted platform for running AI coding agents and cloud development environments on infrastructure you control. It works with any cloud, IDE, OS, Git provider, and IDP.
Coder Workspaces
Coder Workspaces are cloud development environments defined with Terraform, connected through a secure Wireguard tunnel, and automatically shut down when not in use. Agents and developers share the same workspace infrastructure.
- Defined in Terraform: Templates describe the infrastructure for each workspace, from EC2 VMs and Kubernetes Pods to Docker containers.
- Any architecture and OS: Support ARM and x86-64 across Windows, Linux, and macOS from a single deployment.
- Managed by admins: Platform teams create and maintain templates that enforce approved images, resource limits, and security policies.
- Accessed from any IDE: Connect through VS Code, JetBrains, Cursor, a web terminal, remote desktop, or SSH.
- Automatic shutdown: Idle workspaces stop automatically to reduce cloud spend, and restart in seconds when needed.
Coder Agents
Coder Agents is a native AI coding agent built into Coder. The agent loop runs in the Coder control plane on your infrastructure, not in the workspace and not in a vendor's cloud. Developers interact with agents through the web UI or the REST API for programmatic and CI-driven workflows.
- Self-hosted agent loop: The control plane handles planning, model calls, and tool dispatch. Workspaces have zero AI awareness.
- No API keys in workspaces: LLM credentials stay in the control plane.
- Any model: Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Bedrock, or self-hosted endpoints. Switching is a configuration change.
- Governance and cost controls: Centralized model approval, per-user spend limits, and audit logging.
- Open source and inspectable: The full platform is available to audit and extend.
IDE support
You can use:
-
Any Web IDE, such as
- code-server
- JetBrains Projector
- Jupyter
- And others
-
Your existing remote development environment:
-
A file sync such as Mutagen
Why remote development
Provisioning consistent development environments for a large engineering team is difficult. Each developer has preferences for operating systems, editors, and toolchains, and ensuring a reliable build environment across all of them is a maintenance burden. A missed step during onboarding or an unsupported local configuration can cost hours of debugging.
Remote development solves this by moving the environment off the developer's machine and into managed infrastructure. The developer's laptop becomes a portal into the actual compute where work happens. If a device is lost or replaced, access is simply revoked; no source code or credentials are stored locally.
This approach provides:
- Speed: Server-grade hardware accelerates builds, tests, and large workloads without requiring expensive local machines.
- Consistency: Infrastructure tools such as Terraform, nix, Docker, and Dev Containers produce identical environments for every developer.
- Security: Source code stays on private servers. Users and groups are managed through SSO and RBAC.
- Compatibility: Workspaces share infrastructure configurations with staging and production, reducing configuration drift.
- Accessibility: Browser-based IDEs and remote IDE extensions let developers work from any device, including lightweight laptops, Chromebooks, and tablets.
Read more on the Coder blog, the Slack engineering blog, or from Alex Ellis at OpenFaaS.
Why Coder
The key difference between Coder and other platforms is that the entire system, agent loop, control plane, model routing, and workspace provisioning, runs on infrastructure you control.
For agents, this means platform teams can:
- Run the entire agent loop on their infrastructure, with no SaaS dependency for orchestration.
- Define MCP servers, skills, and system prompts centrally so every agent session starts with the same tools, policies, and context.
- Keep LLM credentials out of workspaces entirely.
- Tie every agent action to an authenticated user identity.
- Support air-gapped and restricted-network deployments with self-hosted models.
For workspaces, this means admins can:
- Support any architecture (ARM, x86-64) and operating system (Windows, Linux, macOS).
- Modify pod/container specs, such as adding disks, managing network policies, or setting/updating environment variables.
- Use VM or dedicated workspaces, developing with Kernel features (no container knowledge required).
- Enable persistent workspaces, which are like local machines, but faster and hosted by a cloud service.
Pricing
Coder is free and open source under the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0. All developer productivity features are included in the open source version. A Premium license is available for enhanced support and custom deployments.
How Coder works
Coder workspaces are represented with Terraform, but you do not need to know Terraform to get started. The Coder Registry provides production-ready templates for AWS EC2, Azure, Google Cloud, Kubernetes, and other providers.
Providers and compute environments
Workspaces can include more than just compute. Terraform can add storage buckets, secrets, sidecars, and other resources.
See the templates documentation for details.
What Coder is not
-
Coder is not an infrastructure as code (IaC) platform.
- Terraform is the first IaC provisioner in Coder, allowing Coder admins to define Terraform resources as Coder workspaces.
-
Coder is not a DevOps/CI platform.
- Coder workspaces can be configured to follow best practices for cloud-service-based workloads, but Coder is not responsible for how you define or deploy the software you write.
-
Coder is not an online IDE.
- Coder supports common editors, such as VS Code, vim, and JetBrains, all over HTTPS or SSH.
-
Coder is not a collaboration platform.
- You can use Git with your favorite Git platform and dedicated IDE extensions for pull requests, code reviews, and pair programming.
-
Coder is not a SaaS/fully-managed offering.
- Coder is a self-hosted solution. You must host Coder in a private data center or on a cloud service, such as AWS, Azure, or GCP.

