Restores `agents-access` (**Coder Agents User**) as a built-in organization role and adds it to every organization's `default_org_member_roles`. Members keep Coder Agents by default, and admins can now restrict it per organization by removing the role from the defaults and granting it through IdP role sync or direct assignment. Since #28186, chat permissions lived in the organization-member floor, so the only way to limit Coder Agents was narrowing per-model access lists, which did not hide the feature. - Migration 000602 appends `agents-access` to every organization's defaults, so upgrading keeps every member's access. New organizations get it from `rbac.DefaultOrgMemberRoles()`. - Service accounts do not inherit the role from the defaults (`GetAuthorizationUserRoles`), so they still need an explicit grant for chat. - Owners and Organization Admins keep chat access regardless of defaults. Chats shared with a user stay readable without the role. - Role sync is unchanged. It does not store default roles, so after the default is removed a mapped user gets `agents-access` at their next sign-in. - The retired-role mechanism (`IsRetiredRoleName`) is removed. - `PATCH /api/v2/organizations/{organization}` rejects duplicate `default_org_member_roles` entries (the CLI already de-duplicated them). - Custom organization role requests treat built-in role names case-insensitively, since custom role names are stored lowercase and `Agents-Access` would otherwise become an undeletable shadow of the built-in role. - The Agents permission alert tells restricted members their chats are kept, and the model selector for users without chat permission no longer claims that no models are configured. Docs add "Control who can use Coder Agents" to the Agents getting-started guide. **NOTE**: Migration 000602 deletes custom roles named `agents-access`, which the built-in role would shadow. The down migration does not restore them. Stored member grants of `agents-access` from the earlier built-in role or a deleted custom role stay and now grant chat access. ## Validation - Remote dogfood [UAT](https://dogfood.cdr.dev/agents/e1c18dc6-f6f0-49a1-b6cd-6ce014b51a86) passed onfb441dfae5, covering case variants of built-in role names on create, update, delete, default roles, and member grants. The previous round, ona6fef66b3f, passed the upgrade from main5dde49dffbon a fresh database.6b7f107e0bonly changes wording (docs, comments, UI copy, CLI help) and did not go through UAT. - Local: rbac, dbauthz, idpsync, migrations (chain including 000602 down and up), querier, httpmw, provisionerdserver, coderd and enterprise chat, role, and organization tests, chatd, toolsdk, CLI; frontend vitest, story tests, biome, oxlint, tsc. ## Known issues (not changed here) - Sending from a chat page that was already open when access was removed shows a generic 404 panel until reload. - The members page role editor is not locked for OIDC users under org role sync; the API rejects the change with 400. - Creating a custom role named after a system role (`organization-member`, `organization-service-account`) returns 400 with a raw database unique-constraint error. <details> <summary>Review record</summary> - Remote UAT (UAT Critic sub-agent `6636c855ec`): round 1 on8bec029d35passed with issues, fixed ind7ba937a10and e0f16e1a45f; round 2 ona6fef66b3fpassed; round 3 onfb441dfae5passed. - Codex: round 1 ona6fef66b3ffound one P2 (case variants of built-in role names), fixed infb441dfae5with a red-green test. Rounds 2 and 3 onfb441dfae5found no major issues. - mafredri onfb441dfae5(PR text only): nine wording suggestions applied in 6b7f107e0b9; NOTE extended for stored grants; description trimmed. - Frontend: FE1 to FE10 and coder-frontend-review checkpoints self-audited. </details> > 🤖 This PR was opened by [Xum](https://mux.coder.com) on behalf of @ibetitsmike.
title, markdown_url
| title | markdown_url |
|---|---|
| About | /docs.md |
Coder is a self-hosted platform for running AI coding agents and cloud development environments on infrastructure you control. It works with any cloud, IDE, OS, Git provider, and IDP.
Coder Workspaces
Coder Workspaces are cloud development environments defined with Terraform, connected through a secure Wireguard tunnel, and automatically shut down when not in use. Agents and developers share the same workspace infrastructure.
- Defined in Terraform: Templates describe the infrastructure for each workspace, from EC2 VMs and Kubernetes Pods to Docker containers.
- Any architecture and OS: Support ARM and x86-64 across Windows, Linux, and macOS from a single deployment.
- Managed by admins: Platform teams create and maintain templates that enforce approved images, resource limits, and security policies.
- Accessed from any IDE: Connect through VS Code, JetBrains, Cursor, a web terminal, remote desktop, or SSH.
- Automatic shutdown: Idle workspaces stop automatically to reduce cloud spend, and restart in seconds when needed.
Coder Agents
Coder Agents is a native AI coding agent built into Coder. The agent loop runs in the Coder control plane on your infrastructure, not in the workspace and not in a vendor's cloud. Developers interact with agents through the web UI or the REST API for programmatic and CI-driven workflows.
- Self-hosted agent loop: The control plane handles planning, model calls, and tool dispatch. Workspaces have zero AI awareness.
- No API keys in workspaces: LLM credentials stay in the control plane.
- Any model: Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Bedrock, or self-hosted endpoints. Switching is a configuration change.
- Governance and cost controls: Centralized model approval, per-user spend limits, and audit logging.
- Open source and inspectable: The full platform is available to audit and extend.
IDE support
You can use:
-
Any Web IDE, such as
- code-server
- JetBrains Projector
- Jupyter
- And others
-
Your existing remote development environment:
-
A file sync such as Mutagen
Why remote development
Provisioning consistent development environments for a large engineering team is difficult. Each developer has preferences for operating systems, editors, and toolchains, and ensuring a reliable build environment across all of them is a maintenance burden. A missed step during onboarding or an unsupported local configuration can cost hours of debugging.
Remote development solves this by moving the environment off the developer's machine and into managed infrastructure. The developer's laptop becomes a portal into the actual compute where work happens. If a device is lost or replaced, access is simply revoked; no source code or credentials are stored locally.
This approach provides:
- Speed: Server-grade hardware accelerates builds, tests, and large workloads without requiring expensive local machines.
- Consistency: Infrastructure tools such as Terraform, nix, Docker, and Dev Containers produce identical environments for every developer.
- Security: Source code stays on private servers. Users and groups are managed through SSO and RBAC.
- Compatibility: Workspaces share infrastructure configurations with staging and production, reducing configuration drift.
- Accessibility: Browser-based IDEs and remote IDE extensions let developers work from any device, including lightweight laptops, Chromebooks, and tablets.
Read more on the Coder blog, the Slack engineering blog, or from Alex Ellis at OpenFaaS.
Why Coder
The key difference between Coder and other platforms is that the entire system, agent loop, control plane, model routing, and workspace provisioning, runs on infrastructure you control.
For agents, this means platform teams can:
- Run the entire agent loop on their infrastructure, with no SaaS dependency for orchestration.
- Define MCP servers, skills, and system prompts centrally so every agent session starts with the same tools, policies, and context.
- Keep LLM credentials out of workspaces entirely.
- Tie every agent action to an authenticated user identity.
- Support air-gapped and restricted-network deployments with self-hosted models.
For workspaces, this means admins can:
- Support any architecture (ARM, x86-64) and operating system (Windows, Linux, macOS).
- Modify pod/container specs, such as adding disks, managing network policies, or setting/updating environment variables.
- Use VM or dedicated workspaces, developing with Kernel features (no container knowledge required).
- Enable persistent workspaces, which are like local machines, but faster and hosted by a cloud service.
Pricing
Coder is free and open source under the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0. All developer productivity features are included in the open source version. A Premium license is available for enhanced support and custom deployments.
How Coder works
Coder workspaces are represented with Terraform, but you do not need to know Terraform to get started. The Coder Registry provides production-ready templates for AWS EC2, Azure, Google Cloud, Kubernetes, and other providers.
Providers and compute environments
Workspaces can include more than just compute. Terraform can add storage buckets, secrets, sidecars, and other resources.
See the templates documentation for details.
What Coder is not
-
Coder is not an infrastructure as code (IaC) platform.
- Terraform is the first IaC provisioner in Coder, allowing Coder admins to define Terraform resources as Coder workspaces.
-
Coder is not a DevOps/CI platform.
- Coder workspaces can be configured to follow best practices for cloud-service-based workloads, but Coder is not responsible for how you define or deploy the software you write.
-
Coder is not an online IDE.
- Coder supports common editors, such as VS Code, vim, and JetBrains, all over HTTPS or SSH.
-
Coder is not a collaboration platform.
- You can use Git with your favorite Git platform and dedicated IDE extensions for pull requests, code reviews, and pair programming.
-
Coder is not a SaaS/fully-managed offering.
- Coder is a self-hosted solution. You must host Coder in a private data center or on a cloud service, such as AWS, Azure, or GCP.

