Files
coder/docs/admin/integrations/oauth2-provider.md
T
Nick Vigilante e458692cb8 refactor(docs): convert absolute coder/coder blob/tree/main links to relative (DOCS-351) (#26341)
Closes [DOCS-351](https://linear.app/codercom/issue/DOCS-351).

> [!WARNING]
> **DO NOT MERGE** until
[DOCS-349](https://linear.app/codercom/issue/DOCS-349)
([coder.com#877](https://github.com/coder/coder.com/pull/877)) has
shipped to production and baked for at least one Vercel cycle.
>
> Without DOCS-349, the relative links in this PR resolve to broken
docs-route URLs (`/docs/helm/coder/values.yaml` -> 404) instead of
GitHub URLs tagged with the displayed docs version. DOCS-349 fixes the
rewriter to classify these as GitHub blob/tree URLs with the page's
resolved ref.

## TL;DR

Converts 121 absolute
`https://github.com/coder/coder/(blob|tree)/main/<path>` links across 39
docs markdown files to relative paths. After this lands AND DOCS-349
deploys, every one of these links will follow the displayed docs version
(mainline tag on bare URLs, explicit tag on `/@vX.Y.Z/`, `main` on
`/@main/`) instead of always pointing to `main`.

## Why

Today a reader on `/docs/@v2.30.0/install/docker` follows a
`compose.yaml` link and arrives at `main`'s `compose.yaml`, which
doesn't necessarily match what the docs page describes. Helm values,
Terraform templates, and source-code references in particular drift
across versions. The fix is to let the coder.com rewriter substitute the
page's resolved ref into the URL; that only works on relative links.

## Example payoff (post-DOCS-349)

| URL | Today (absolute, always `main`) | After (relative + rewriter) |
|---|---|---|
| `/docs/install/docker` |
`https://github.com/coder/coder/blob/main/compose.yaml` |
`https://github.com/coder/coder/blob/v2.34.1/compose.yaml` (today's
mainline) |
| `/docs/@v2.30.0/install/docker` | same as above |
`https://github.com/coder/coder/blob/v2.30.0/compose.yaml` |
| `/docs/@main/install/docker` | same as above |
`https://github.com/coder/coder/blob/main/compose.yaml` |

## Scope

- **121 conversions** across **39 files**.
- Verb breakdown: `tree/main` (directories) and `blob/main` (files),
both flipped to relative paths.
- Line anchors (`#L23-L24`) and query strings preserved verbatim.
- Conversion is mechanical: relative path computed from the doc file's
directory to the target via `os.path.relpath`. Any path starting at the
same directory or below gets a `./` prefix; otherwise `../` chains.

## Rebased on main

The branch was rebased onto `main` after the DOCS-350 hotfix
([#26339](https://github.com/coder/coder/pull/26339)) merged. The hotfix
repointed 3 `docs-backend-contrib-guide` refs in `backend.md` to `main`,
which then needed the same `main` -> relative conversion this PR is
doing for the other 121 links. The conflict was resolved by reapplying
the mechanical conversion to `backend.md` after taking the hotfix's
content. Net result: those 3 links land here as relative, same as
everything else. New HEAD `3f501cb622`.

## Inline fix folded in: dead `nix` link

- `docs/about/contributing/CONTRIBUTING.md:7` -> `../../../nix`

The original absolute URL `https://github.com/coder/coder/tree/main/nix`
already returned 404 today. Repointed to `flake.nix` (modern Nix
entrypoint, what the prose "Nix environment" semantically refers to).
Closes [DOCS-357](https://linear.app/codercom/issue/DOCS-357) here since
the `check-docs` Linkspector job surfaced it during rebase; cheaper to
fix inline than in a separate single-line PR.

## Out of scope (filed separately)

- [DOCS-350](https://linear.app/codercom/issue/DOCS-350): 3 dead
`docs-backend-contrib-guide` branch refs in `backend.md`
([#26339](https://github.com/coder/coder/pull/26339), merged).
- [DOCS-352](https://linear.app/codercom/issue/DOCS-352): 10 SHA-pinned
`(blob|tree)/<sha>` links pending intent review.
- [DOCS-355](https://linear.app/codercom/issue/DOCS-355): code-server
analog (4 absolute `(blob|tree)/main` links in `coder/code-server`).
- [DOCS-356](https://linear.app/codercom/issue/DOCS-356): 2 upstream
content bugs in `coder/code-server/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md` (independent of
this PR).


## Not triggering `/coder-agents-review`

Docs-only edit; per `AGENTS.md` the bot review is reserved for
product/CI changes.

## Pre-mortem

| Concern | Mitigation |
|---|---|
| Merging before DOCS-349 deploys regresses ~120 currently-working links
into 404s on coder.com | Clear DO-NOT-MERGE banner; tracked as blocker
in Linear. |
| Relative path computed incorrectly (off-by-one `..`) | Verified all
114 newly-relative non-md/non-image paths resolve to existing files in
the repo (only exception is the pre-existing dead `nix` link above). |
| Line anchors stripped during conversion | Preserved by the
substitution regex; verified `#L<n>-L<m>` cases in `airgap.md` and
`speed-up-templates.md`. |
| Future code reorgs change file locations | Relative links will start
pointing to nothing. Same failure mode as absolute links pointing to
renamed files; can be caught with a future link-checker job. |

## Validation

```
$ grep -rE 'github\.com/coder/coder/(blob|tree)/main' docs --include="*.md" | wc -l
0
$ git diff --stat origin/main | tail -1
39 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
```

114 newly-relative paths verified to resolve to existing repo files
(Python `os.path.exists` check on each computed target).

<details>
<summary>Decision log + planning context</summary>

**Why relative over `(blob|tree)/{{currentDocsVersion}}/...`
templating**: relative paths require zero markdown-system support and
zero upstream churn beyond this one PR. Templating would require a
preprocessor on `coder.com` side AND a convention upstream authors have
to remember; relative paths just work in a plain editor and
`github.com`'s own renderer too.

**Why `./` prefix on same-directory targets**: makes the conversion
grep-able later (`grep -E '\((\.\./|\./)'`).

**Why preserve `#L<n>-L<m>` anchors verbatim**: the anchor is meaningful
to the linked file's content, not to the URL form; keeping it as-is
preserves authorial intent. If the file later changes such that the line
range drifts, that's a different problem the SHA-pin audit
([DOCS-352](https://linear.app/codercom/issue/DOCS-352)) will surface.

</details>

---

*Generated by Coder Agents on @nickvigilante's behalf.*





## Drive-by external link fix folded in

`docs/about/contributing/CONTRIBUTING.md:296` cited
`https://reflectoring.io/meaningful-commit-messages/` which is returning
HTTP 503 (the host appears to be down site-wide right now). `check-docs`
Linkspector flagged it after the rebase. Replaced with
`https://cbea.ms/git-commit/` (Chris Beams' canonical "If applied, this
commit will..." article, confirmed 200), which is the original source of
the rule the prose recites anyway.
2026-06-22 11:39:12 -04:00

10 KiB

OAuth2 Provider (Experimental)

Warning

The OAuth2 provider functionality is currently experimental and unstable. This feature:

  • Is subject to breaking changes without notice
  • May have incomplete functionality
  • Is not recommended for production use
  • Requires the oauth2 experiment flag to be enabled

Use this feature for development and testing purposes only.

Coder can act as an OAuth2 authorization server, allowing third-party applications to authenticate users through Coder and access the Coder API on their behalf. This enables integrations where external applications can leverage Coder's authentication and user management.

Requirements

  • Admin privileges in Coder
  • OAuth2 experiment flag enabled
  • HTTPS recommended for production deployments

Enable OAuth2 Provider

Add the oauth2 experiment flag to your Coder server:

coder server --experiments oauth2

Or set the environment variable:

CODER_EXPERIMENTS=oauth2

Creating OAuth2 Applications

Method 1: Web UI

  1. Navigate to Deployment SettingsOAuth2 Applications
  2. Click Create Application
  3. Fill in the application details:
    • Name: Your application name
    • Callback URL: https://yourapp.example.com/callback (web) or myapp://callback (native/desktop)
    • Icon: Optional icon URL

Method 2: Management API

Create an application using the Coder API:

curl -X POST \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $CODER_SESSION_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "name": "My Application",
    "callback_url": "https://myapp.example.com/callback",
    "icon": "https://myapp.example.com/icon.png"
  }' \
  "$CODER_URL/api/v2/oauth2-provider/apps"

Generate a client secret:

curl -X POST \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $CODER_SESSION_TOKEN" \
  "$CODER_URL/api/v2/oauth2-provider/apps/$APP_ID/secrets"

Integration Patterns

Client Authentication Methods

Coder supports the following OAuth2 client authentication methods at the token endpoint (/oauth2/tokens):

  • client_secret_basic (recommended): HTTP Basic authentication (RFC 6749 §2.3.1). The username is client_id and the password is client_secret.
  • client_secret_post: Form-based authentication where client_id and client_secret are sent in the request body.

Coder supports both methods for compatibility; existing integrations using client_secret_post do not need to change.

If you use Dynamic Client Registration (RFC 7591) and omit token_endpoint_auth_method, clients default to client_secret_basic. To request client_secret_post, set token_endpoint_auth_method to client_secret_post in the registration request.

If client authentication fails, the token endpoint returns HTTP 401 with an OAuth2 invalid_client error and a WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="coder" response header.

Standard OAuth2 Flow

  1. Authorization Request: Redirect users to Coder's authorization endpoint:

    https://coder.example.com/oauth2/authorize?
      client_id=your-client-id&
      response_type=code&
      redirect_uri=https://yourapp.example.com/callback&
      state=random-string
    
  2. Token Exchange: Exchange the authorization code for an access token.

    Option A: HTTP Basic authentication (client_secret_basic, recommended)

    curl -X POST \
      -u "$CLIENT_ID:$CLIENT_SECRET" \
      -H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
      -d "grant_type=authorization_code" \
      -d "code=$AUTH_CODE" \
      -d "redirect_uri=https://yourapp.example.com/callback" \
      "$CODER_URL/oauth2/tokens"
    

    Option B: Form parameters (client_secret_post)

    curl -X POST \
      -H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
      -d "grant_type=authorization_code" \
      -d "code=$AUTH_CODE" \
      -d "client_id=$CLIENT_ID" \
      -d "client_secret=$CLIENT_SECRET" \
      -d "redirect_uri=https://yourapp.example.com/callback" \
      "$CODER_URL/oauth2/tokens"
    
  3. API Access: Use the access token to call Coder's API:

    curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $ACCESS_TOKEN" \
      "$CODER_URL/api/v2/users/me"
    

Note

The PKCE flow below is the required integration path. The example above is shown for reference but omits the mandatory code_challenge parameter. See PKCE Flow for the complete flow.

PKCE Flow (Required)

PKCE is required for all OAuth2 authorization code flows. Coder enforces PKCE in compliance with the OAuth 2.1 specification. Both public and confidential clients must include PKCE parameters:

  1. Generate a code verifier and challenge:

    CODE_VERIFIER=$(openssl rand -base64 96 | tr -d "=+/" | cut -c1-128)
    CODE_CHALLENGE=$(echo -n $CODE_VERIFIER | openssl dgst -sha256 -binary | base64 | tr -d "=+/" | cut -c1-43)
    
  2. Include PKCE parameters in the authorization request:

    https://coder.example.com/oauth2/authorize?
      client_id=your-client-id&
      response_type=code&
      code_challenge=$CODE_CHALLENGE&
      code_challenge_method=S256&
      redirect_uri=https://yourapp.example.com/callback
    
  3. Include the code verifier in the token exchange (see Client Authentication Methods):

    curl -X POST \
      -u "$CLIENT_ID:$CLIENT_SECRET" \
      -H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
      -d "grant_type=authorization_code" \
      -d "code=$AUTH_CODE" \
      -d "code_verifier=$CODE_VERIFIER" \
      -d "redirect_uri=https://yourapp.example.com/callback" \
      "$CODER_URL/oauth2/tokens"
    

Discovery Endpoints

Coder provides OAuth2 discovery endpoints for programmatic integration:

  • Authorization Server Metadata: GET /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server
  • Protected Resource Metadata: GET /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource

These endpoints return server capabilities and endpoint URLs according to RFC 8414 and RFC 9728.

Token Management

Refresh Tokens

Refresh an expired access token.

Option A: HTTP Basic authentication (client_secret_basic)

curl -X POST \
  -u "$CLIENT_ID:$CLIENT_SECRET" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
  -d "grant_type=refresh_token" \
  -d "refresh_token=$REFRESH_TOKEN" \
  "$CODER_URL/oauth2/tokens"

Option B: Form parameters (client_secret_post)

curl -X POST \
  -H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
  -d "grant_type=refresh_token" \
  -d "refresh_token=$REFRESH_TOKEN" \
  -d "client_id=$CLIENT_ID" \
  -d "client_secret=$CLIENT_SECRET" \
  "$CODER_URL/oauth2/tokens"

Revoke Access

Revoke all tokens for an application:

curl -X DELETE \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $CODER_SESSION_TOKEN" \
  "$CODER_URL/oauth2/tokens?client_id=$CLIENT_ID"

Testing and Development

Coder provides comprehensive test scripts for OAuth2 development:

# Navigate to the OAuth2 test scripts
cd scripts/oauth2/

# Run the full automated test suite
./test-mcp-oauth2.sh

# Create a test application for manual testing
eval $(./setup-test-app.sh)

# Run an interactive browser-based test
./test-manual-flow.sh

# Clean up when done
./cleanup-test-app.sh

For more details on testing, see the OAuth2 test scripts README.

Common Issues

"OAuth2 experiment not enabled"

Add oauth2 to your experiment flags: coder server --experiments oauth2

"Invalid redirect_uri"

Ensure the redirect URI in your request exactly matches the one registered for your application.

If you see this error when authorizing, the registered callback URL uses a blocked scheme (javascript:, data:, file:, or ftp:). Update the application's callback URL to a valid scheme (see Callback URL schemes).

"PKCE verification failed"

Verify that the code_verifier used in the token request matches the one used to generate the code_challenge.

Callback URL schemes

Custom URI schemes (myapp://, vscode://, jetbrains://, etc.) are fully supported for native and desktop applications. The OS routes the redirect back to the registered application without requiring a running HTTP server.

The following schemes are blocked for security reasons: javascript:, data:, file:, ftp:.

Security Considerations

  • Use HTTPS: Always use HTTPS in production to protect tokens in transit
  • Implement PKCE: PKCE is mandatory for all authorization code clients (public and confidential)
  • Validate redirect URLs: Only register trusted redirect URIs. Dangerous schemes (javascript:, data:, file:, ftp:) are blocked by the server, but custom URI schemes for native apps (myapp://) are permitted
  • Rotate secrets: Periodically rotate client secrets using the management API

Limitations

As an experimental feature, the current implementation has limitations:

  • No scope system - all tokens have full API access
  • No client credentials grant support
  • Implicit grant (response_type=token) is not supported; OAuth 2.1 deprecated this flow due to token leakage risks, and requests return unsupported_response_type
  • Limited to opaque access tokens (no JWT support)

Standards Compliance

This implementation follows established OAuth2 standards including RFC 6749 (OAuth2 core), RFC 7636 (PKCE), and the OAuth 2.1 draft. Coder enforces OAuth 2.1 requirements including mandatory PKCE for all authorization code grants, exact redirect URI string matching, rejection of the implicit grant, and CSRF protections on consent pages.

Next Steps

Feedback

This is an experimental feature under active development. Please report issues and feedback through GitHub Issues with the oauth2 label.