Files
coder/coderd/database
Kyle Carberry 1c78bd84b7 feat(coderd): copy agent context resources into the per-chat pin (#26438)
## What

Populates `chat_context_resources` (the per-chat pinned copy added in
#26430) by copying from `workspace_agent_context_resources` at the
points where a chat's `context_aggregate_hash` is set, in the same
transaction, so the pinned hash and pinned bodies always agree. No
prompt-building change yet; consuming the pinned copy in
`prepareGeneration` is a later, experiment-gated PR.

## How

- `HydrateAgentChatsContext` now hydrates NULL-hash chats **and** copies
the agent's resources onto them in one statement (a data-modifying CTE),
so the chat-create and agent-push paths need no Go change.
- New queries `InsertAgentContextResourcesIntoChat`,
`DeleteChatContextResources`, `ListChatContextResources`, each with a
hand-written dbauthz wrapper (per-chat update/read) and a
`MethodTestSuite` entry.
- `RefreshChatContext` re-pins resources via a shared `repinChatContext`
helper (clear-then-copy in a transaction). A dirty chat keeps its old
bodies until refresh.
- On agent rebind (e.g. a workspace rebuild produces a new agent), the
chat's context is re-pinned to the new agent so it stops injecting the
previous agent's resources. Best-effort: a context error never fails the
binding.

## Invariant

A chat's `chat_context_resources` always correspond to its
`context_aggregate_hash`. Bodies are (re)written only when the hash is
set (hydrate, refresh, rebind); a dirty chat keeps its old bodies until
refresh.

## Testing

Extends the context integration test to push real resources and assert
the copy across hydrate, dirty (no re-copy), and refresh. The dbauthz
`MethodTestSuite` covers the three new methods.

<details>
<summary>Why clear-then-copy (two statements)</summary>

The refresh/rebind re-pin clears the chat's rows then inserts the
agent's. It uses two sequential statements inside the transaction rather
than a single `WITH cleared AS (DELETE ...) INSERT ...`, because a
data-modifying CTE cannot see its own delete under snapshot isolation,
so overlapping sources (the common case: the same files re-pinned) would
collide on the `(chat_id, source)` primary key. The hydrate path inserts
into never-pinned (NULL-hash) chats and uses `ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE`
defensively.

</details>

<details>
<summary>Follow-ups</summary>

- `prepareGeneration` consuming the pinned instructions and skills
(experiment-gated).
- `codersdk.ChatContext` resources plus changed diff, and the frontend
indicator/refresh.
- Removing the per-turn pull and `last_injected_context`.

</details>

---

*This PR was created by Coder Agents on behalf of @kylecarbs.* Builds on
#26430.
2026-06-17 00:10:07 -07:00
..