_Disclaimer:_ _produced_ _by_ _Claude_ _Opus_ _4\.6,_ _reviewed_ _by_ _me._
**This is a breaking change.** Users who are not have `owner` or sitewide `auditor` roles will no longer be able to view interceptions.
Regular users should not need to view this information; in fact, it could be used by a malicious insider to see what information we track and don't track to exfiltrate data or perform actions unobserved.
---
Changed authorization for AI Bridge interception-related operations from system-level permissions to resource-specific permissions. The following functions now authorize against `rbac.ResourceAibridgeInterception` instead of `rbac.ResourceSystem`:
- `ListAIBridgeTokenUsagesByInterceptionIDs`
- `ListAIBridgeToolUsagesByInterceptionIDs`
- `ListAIBridgeUserPromptsByInterceptionIDs`
Updated RBAC roles to grant AI Bridge interception permissions:
- **User/Member roles**: Can create and update AI Bridge interceptions but cannot read them back
- **Service accounts**: Same create/update permissions without read access
- **Owners/Auditors**: Retain full read access to all interceptions
Removed system-level authorization bypass in `populatedAndConvertAIBridgeInterceptions` function, allowing proper resource-level authorization checks.
Updated tests to reflect the new permission model where members cannot view AI Bridge interceptions, even their own, while owners and auditors maintain full visibility.
## Summary
AI Bridge is moving to General Availability in v2.30 and will require
the AI Governance Add-On license in future versions. This adds a soft
warning for deployments using AI Bridge via Premium/Enterprise
FeatureSet without an explicit AI Bridge add-on license.
Relates to: https://github.com/coder/internal/issues/1226
## Changes
- Track whether AI Bridge was explicitly granted via license Features
(add-on) vs inherited from FeatureSet
- Show soft warning when AI Bridge is enabled and entitled via
FeatureSet but not via explicit add-on
- Changed AI Bridge enablement from hardcoded `true` to check
`CODER_AIBRIDGE_ENABLED` deployment config
## Behavior Change
AI Bridge is now only marked as "enabled" in entitlements when
`CODER_AIBRIDGE_ENABLED=true` is set in the deployment config.
Previously, it was always enabled for Premium/Enterprise licenses
regardless of the config setting.
This change ensures that users who do not use AI Bridge will not see the
soft warning about the upcoming license requirement.
## Warning Message
> AI Bridge is now Generally Available in v2.30. In a future Coder
version, your deployment will require the AI Governance Add-On to
continue using this feature. Please reach out to your account team or
sales@coder.com to learn more.
## Behavior
| Condition | Warning Shown |
|-----------|---------------|
| AI Bridge disabled | ❌ No |
| AI Bridge enabled + explicit add-on license | ❌ No |
| AI Bridge enabled + Premium/Enterprise FeatureSet (no add-on) | ✅ Yes
|
## Screenshots
### 1. No license
<img width="1708" height="577" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cbdbfd4d-55de-4d70-8abf-2665f458e96f"
/>
### 2. No license + CODER_AIBRIDGE_ENABLED=true
<img width="1716" height="513" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/344aae76-7703-485f-b568-1f13a1efa48f"
/>
### 3. Premium license + CODER_AIBRIDGE_ENABLED=false
<img width="1687" height="389" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c2be12b0-1c0f-438d-a293-f9ec9fe6a736"
/>
### 4. Premium license + CODER_AIBRIDGE_ENABLED=true
<img width="1707" height="525" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1a4640e1-e656-4f9b-bed0-9390cb5d6a84"
/>
## Notes
- TODO comments added to mark code that should be removed when AI Bridge
enforcement is added
- Feature continues to work - this is just a transitional warning (soft
enforcement)
Addresses [`aibridge#54`](https://github.com/coder/aibridge/issues/54)
When querying against the values in the database for
`/api/experimental/aibridge/interceptions` we found strange behaviour
wherein there was interceptions that lacked prompting and other various
fields we want. Generally this was as a result of the data not actually
existing for these values (as they were inflight).
The simple solution to this was to hide them if they didn't exist. This
PR addresses that.
---------
Co-authored-by: Danny Kopping <danny@coder.com>
Danny Kopping